Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />May 2, 1979 <br />Mr. Roy Parachini <br />Dorn Ready-Mix Corp. <br />19671 County load 7/10 <br />Fort Morgan, Co. 30701 <br />Dear Mr. Parachini: <br />The folbowing information is needed in order to make your applic~tlon for <br />renewal adequate and In orJer for the appllcatton to be recommended for consider- <br />ation at the June 1977 ~iine~' L.,rn: ~.eclamation Board mcetinn. Please orovlde your <br />responses as soon as possiLle so [hat there will be .:d~uuate tlrre for further <br />review. <br />Revie~v Comments <br />Exhibit ~ - Index 'lap. <br />A) The index niao shoulr' be latded zs suc.`•i. The nap should nr.~vide <br />Lasie information such as Hanes of ronas, sh~•: the access to <br />tfie nine, and he ~~f a scale sufficient to indicate the nines <br />relative proximity to other importznt features of the an~o. One <br />neap should be sufficient to convey this information. <br />Ii. Exhibit L' - Pre-mining and Mining ;lap. <br />Claps In this exhihit should include the follo~•ring information: <br />A) A legend accurately descri_bin~ boundaries and other essential <br />features of the map. On the maps that have been subr^it[e~' it <br />is difficult to determine what some features Wean zn<+ there <br />are no legends describing ,those features. <br />B) Contour intervals of the entire area depicted on the map. not <br />just the area to be mined.. Ten foot contour intervals are <br />preferp~, however, intervals greater than or less than ten <br />feet may be acceptable under certain circumstances. <br />C) Boundary lines and names of surface avners of all immediately <br />adjacent lands. The map entlt7ed ''Ovmership Map" is confusing <br />because It lacks boundary limas of parcels owned by adjacent <br />land owners and not all adjacent lands are identified with an <br />owner. <br />