My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO27463
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO27463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:46:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:00:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984036
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
11/18/1996
Doc Name
STATUS REPORT ON AUGMENTATION FOR M74-052 PIT 1 AND M84-036 DAKOLIOS PIT SUBMITTAL TO THE DWR
From
VARRA CO INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F' .. <br />i <br />Varna Companies, Inc. Friday 15 November 1 <br />2130 South 96th Street, Broomfield. CO 80020 (303)666-6657 Fax Number (303)666-6743 <br />Christina Kamnikar <br />Colorado Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, #215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />~~~ I~~I~~~~~~I~~~~~ <br />EivE~ <br />18 1996 <br />Division or i ~u~erars d ~auiuyy <br />Subject: Status Report on Augmentation for M74-052 Pit 1 and M84-03 <br />Dakolios Pit. Submittal to the Colorado Division of Water Resources. <br />Dear Ms. Kamnikar: <br />As of Wednesday 13 November 1996, Bill Maclntyre indicated he woul contact <br />you by telephone to assure you that our plan of augmentation will go b fore the <br />State Engineer, possibly as early as next week, and that he will re ommend <br />approval and expects it to be signed. This approved augmentation pl n should <br />be adequate to belay your concerns regarding backfilling, fully tw months <br />ahead of the schedule for which the DMG has been informed of and greed to <br />relative to Pit 1. <br />Relative to soils. As I indicated at the time of the inspection, the ethnical <br />revision did not show all of the soil resources available, but reflected th t portion <br />which I believed would show that adequate reserves were in place. As ndicated <br />at the time of the inspection, the entire fines piles are continuously bei g added <br />to. <br />The June 1996 aerial photograph, and current site conditions, substan late that <br />soil resources have not been fully salvaged or stockpiled. Neithe did the <br />estimates included in the revision include that volume of soil from soil tockpile <br />S, which has grown since your field measurement of it. <br />In response to your inspection report, I have verified the greater accura y of the <br />aerial photograph and remeasured soil resources over the property, tilizing a <br />measured pace and mean estimates of stockpile height and dimensio s [aided <br />by a clinometer], reasonable enough to assure adequate soil reso rtes for <br />reclamation. In doing so, I have adjusted former estimates, making th m more <br />conservative [less volume]. Heights were adjusted down. Cross-sectio s of the <br />tops of piles did not include outslope areas, and were averaged to reflec a mean <br />width. There is in effect, great probability that the actual soil volume on the <br />ground are in excess of that measured and calculated. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.