PERMFILE50297 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

w/~/- ~~ •I~ ~ ~~- • 37 E. Colorado Avenue III III III IIIIIII III , 4 Denver, C0 80210 ~~'d. `,. .•.~-~ - (303) 722-9067 ~ " =. =~ r=..: .. ~~" ~' Environmental Services Botanicai Studies Photography ~_- , ~'° • December 30, 1991 ... ~~L. Berhan Keffelew Mined Land Reclamation 215 Centennial Bldg. !~~4r 1313 Sherman St `~ ~&r~d Denver, CO 80203 "'t~n~ n;,,, RE: Hond estimates for Transit Mix Concrete, Daniels Sand Pit #2, and Castle Sand Pit Your file nos.: M-73-007, M-77-213 Dear Mr. Keffelew: Thank you for your letter of December 20, 1991 detailing the Division's position on the bonding issue for these operations. First, I would like to offer a few minor corrections, just for the record. The Division's original proposal on December 17, 1991 was for an amount of $5,000 per acre for the total permit acreage, not just the disturbed acreage. This is detailed in a letter to myself from Bruce Humphries dated December 17, 1991. That original bond proposal was for a total of $1,628,000, or $1,498,000 in addition to the existing bond. On December 19, 1991 I explained that it was Transit Mix's position that the Division did not actually need $5,000 per acre on the acreage that was still undisturbed. Your description of our proposal is accurate, except that we also offered to limit disturbance to the existing disturbance area unless additional bond was provided and the land to be additionally disturbed was identified on a map. Your description of the final agreed to figure is correct. In effect, the agreement was for a final bond figure that was $55,000 higher than my client's proposal. Of course, as you recall, these figures were dependent upon the disturbed acreage actually being 165 acres. If, after more careful analysis, it was found to be more or less than that figure it was agreed that the final figure would be adjusted accordingly. According to my notes, the final item we discussed was the preparation of a map that would identify all disturbed land in the permit that was shown on the aerial photos in addition to arty further disturbances that might have developed since the aerial photo was taken (October 16, 1991).