My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR13440
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
3000
>
APPCOR13440
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:33:41 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:42:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
3/28/1985
From
PEABODY COAL CO
To
DOW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ii i iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br /> 999 <br />PEABODY COAL COMPANY <br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN DIVISION <br />10!76 EAST NARVARD AVENUE <br />SUITE A00 <br />DENVER, COLORADO B03l1 <br />(1031 !l7~8909 <br />March 26, 1985 <br />,~ <br /> <br />Mr. Hal Simpson <br />Assistant State Engineer I <br />Office of the State Engineer I' <br />Division of Water Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Simpson: <br />Last week, Mr. Jim McDanold of your Division and I discussed over the phone your memo <br />dated March I, 1985 to Ms. Anne C. Baldrige of the Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />(MLRD) regarding Peabody Coal Company's plans to drill a shop well at the Seneca II-W <br />Mine. You state in your memo that "Since Dry Creek and Sage Creek are considered <br />over appropriated, the well permit will be denied". After discussion with Mr. McDonald <br />about the well depth, well design, and the geology of the Dry and Sage Creek environs, <br />he, in consultation with one of your staff geologists, indicated that there was a good <br />likelihood that the Trout Creek Sandstone Member of the Iles Formation (the aquifer in <br />which the well will be completed) is not tributary to Dry or Sage Creek. For this reason, <br />he stated that a well permit might be issued by your office without any delays. Please <br />find attached the permit application for the Seneca Il-W Mine shop well. <br />As substantiation to our opinion that the Trout Creek Sandstone is not tributary to Dry or <br />Sage Creek and that the outcrop of the Trout Creek Sandstone in these drainages is, in <br />fact, a recharge area for the aquifer, I have supplied the following information with this <br />letter: <br />I. Geologic map of part of Routt and Moffat Counties. Indicated on this map are the <br />location of the shop well, the Seneca II-bV mine permit boundary, the Dry and Sage <br />Creek drainage areas and the outcrop of the Trout Creek Sandstone. Superimposed <br />over the geology are the structure contours (feet above mean sea level) drawn on top <br />of the Trout Creek Sandstone. As is apparent from the map, The Trout Creek <br />Sandstone generally outcrops along Topographic highs which also mimic the <br />structural highs. The Trout Creek Sandstone is exposed along the eastern margin of <br />the permit area and locally dips nine (9) degrees to the southwest. Regionally, the <br />aquifer dips to the north and west. <br />2. Stratigraphic column of the geology in the Seneca II-W Mine area. As indicated <br />from the attached figure, the Trout Creek Sandstone lies approximately 500 feet <br />sTratigraphically below the Wadge coal, the lowest coal seam to be mined at the <br />Seneca II-W Mine and is confined by numerous beds of shales and silty shales. As a <br />result, the Trout Creek Sandstone is not hydraulically connected to any of the strata <br />to be mined and is generally isolated from the Dry and Sage Creek drainages. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.