APPCOR11369

• Permit No: C1981021
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Date: 10/22/1980
• Doc Name: AMENDMENT APPLICATION LOADOUT BOURG COAL STRIP OUR FILE 79-125
• From: MLR
• To: FLATIRON PAVING CO
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~~, ~
.>a
_~ J..
DFPARTMENi Of NAT URAI. RESOU Ri:F$
U. Munn: Pascoe, Ewan rve Urtec i~~r

423 Centennial Pudding, 1313 Sherman Slreel
Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. [phone]
Ill lllllllllllll Ill
David C. Shelton
October 22, 1980 Director
ldrs. Margaret lV.inter
Flatiron Paving Company
P.0. Box 229
Boulder, Colorado 80306
RE: Amendment Application - Loadout
Bourg Coal Strip
Our rile No. 70-125
Oe.Tr Margie:
In order to clarify to you how this Division intends to handle the amendment
application recently submitted by Flatiron, I'would like to summarize our
telephone conversation of October 21, 1930. At that time, I infor-ned you
that the amendment application will be considered complete, since a complete-
ness review was not performed within the 10 day time period allowed by the statute.
The filing date of the application is therefore the date it was received in this
office, October 1, 1980. Since the application was filed prior to the effective
date of the Colorado state program, Flatiron is en*_iiled to a review according
to interim standards, as specified in Section 34-33-109(3) of the coal Act. A
permanent program application will ofcourse also be requirod.
As I discussed faith you, although the application is coTr~plete, it is nevertheless
seriously inaclegtlatc. A 1lricf review of the materials submitte,] revealed the
following deficiencies: ~ '
1. The mop which was submitted is tn~acceptable. Please provide a map which
shows the existing topography (I would suggest a two Coot or five foot
contour interval), as well as the location of streams or other nearby
features, such as roads, buildings or stockponds.
2. Additional information relative to the present condition of the site
should be scTpplied, including the nature and extent of the existing
disturbance. Is the road an existing road?
3. The extent to which Flatiron intends to modify the site should be specified.
1Vi11 the road be iugirovcd? Will the area be regraded, or additional fill
material imported? Rcil.l any buildings or other st n:ctures be constntcted?
4. A sediment control pl;tn nnlst be submitted, including direction of drainage,
and location and design calculations for :uty sediment ponds, culverts or
diversions. Tf the existing "impotnxLl~ent" is to be used For sediment
control, it uwst be upgraded to n;eet desi~r criteria.
5. i)escriptivc information rmlst he provided relative to the land use, vegeta-
tion, and surface :urd };round water hyclrolo{!y of the inmledintely adjacent