My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-05_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-12-05_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 10:47:26 PM
Creation date
12/6/2016 9:45:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/5/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #2
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR81
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NE WMON T RECEIVED Newmont Paining Corporation <br /> 6363 South Fiddler's Green Circle,Suite 800 <br /> Greenwood Village,CO 80111 <br /> t-IDEC 0 5 2016 F 719-689-3254 <br /> v,w*ne irriont com <br /> DNISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> SENT CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br /> 7015-1660-0000-0779-8164 <br /> December 1, 2016 <br /> Mr. Timothy Cazier, P.E. <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Permit No. M-1980-244; Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company ("CC&V"); <br /> Cresson Project; — Response to DRMS Technical Revision (TR-81) Secondary Adequacy <br /> Review for High Grade Mill Vat Leach Containment. <br /> Dear Mr. Cazier: <br /> Following the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's(DRMS)November 18, 2016 letter <br /> for additional adequacy review comments of technical revision TR-81, please see CC&V's <br /> response to comments in bold and DRMS comments in italics. <br /> Comment 1: The Operator has represented the capacity of the existing secondary <br /> containment structure as 17,039.262 cubic feet. The Division disagrees. Based on <br /> information provided in the submittal, the Division has calculated the existing capacity <br /> as 13,797 cubic feet. This was determined by subtracting the areas consumed by the <br /> "intrusions" located below the height of the containment wall. Based upon site <br /> observations, the Division estimates the height of the eight vat leach tank foundations at <br /> 2.5 feet, or the same elevation as the crest of the existing containment wall. <br /> Response 1: CC&V agrees with the Division that the existing available capacity is <br /> 13,797 W. <br /> Comment 2: The Operator's response indicated an upset condition might not be <br /> discovered for four hours. However, the Operator's response did not include information <br /> regarding the maximum amount of time to shut down the leach circuit after an upset <br /> condition is discovered. Please provide the Division with the maximum time to shut down <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.