My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-18_PERMIT FILE - M2016030
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016030
>
2016-11-18_PERMIT FILE - M2016030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 6:32:10 AM
Creation date
11/18/2016 2:15:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016030
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/18/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Brannan Sand and Gravel Co. / Ready Mix
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B RA 1 <br /> tSMUZA ra( ) � TI UA <br /> " Founded 1906 <br /> 17 November 2016 <br /> Peter Hays <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Re: Response to Second Adequacy Review,Valley's Edge Resource, M-2016-030 <br /> Dear Mr. Hays: <br /> On behalf of Applicant/Operator Brannan Sand and Gravel Company, L.L.C.,this letter responds to the <br /> numbered items in the second adequacy letter for the above-referenced Regular 112 Reclamation Permit <br /> application. <br /> 1. The Applicant believes that all owners of record have been noticed in accordance with Rule 1.6.2(e). <br /> The most recent notice was mailed to owners of the Sack property on November 2, 2016,as explained <br /> in the Applicant's last (November 8)adequacy response. Thus, permit action may be taken as of <br /> November 22, 2016,twenty days after the postmark of that mailing. <br /> The Division's most recent letter identified a number of parties as potentially entitled to notice. For <br /> the following reasons,there is no outstanding compliance issue with Rule 1.6.2(e)associated with <br /> these parties: <br /> a. Zayo Bandwidth is not an owner of record. As noted on Exhibit C-1, and in accordance with the <br /> common practice of co-locating telecommunications facilities, Zayo operates under agreement or <br /> license with the easement owner. In the instant case, Level 3 is the relevant easement owner and <br /> was properly noticed. <br /> b. Hunt Brothers Properties does not own property within 200 feet of the Affected Land. All <br /> property on the west side of the Union Pacific Railroad is outside the notice boundary, as the total <br /> railroad right-of-way creates a 400-foot offset between such property and the Affected Land. <br /> c. The southern boundary of the Affected Land is separated from Weld County Road 6 by <br /> approximately 1300 feet(one-quarter mile). In this general locale,the roadway is known as <br /> Crown Prince Boulevard and is maintained by the City of Brighton. No public or private facilities <br /> associated with this roadway are within the notification radius. <br /> d. See 1c, above. Note also that,to the extent that,with its access drive,the Affected Land extends <br /> north to Weld County Road 8,the right-of-way onto which the driveway will connect is owned <br /> 2500 East Brannan Way I Denver I CO 80229 1 303.534.1231 Tel 1 303,534.1236 Fax <br /> www.brannan 1.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.