My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2016-01-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:14:06 PM
Creation date
1/8/2016 1:35:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/5/2016
Doc Name
Danielson Correspondence Regarding Process TR 20, 23, 25, 25, and 26
From
Law office of Luke Danielson
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAW OFFICES OF <br />219 North Iowa Street Suite A Gunnison Colorado 81230 USA <br />LUKE J. DANIELSON, P.C. wwwldinielsonlaw.com p: (970) 641-4605 f (970) 641-4439 <br />Luke J. Danielson, luke@ldanielsonlawcom <br />Ms. Robin A. Reilley, GISP <br />Environmental Protection Specialist 0D <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety RF -Ce%* <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources 5 Z01b <br />1313 Sherman St. 3W Q <br />Room 215 S,ON OF RECLARATION <br />Denver, CO 80203 DMMiNiNG ANO SAFETY <br />By United States Mail and by email to robin.reilley@state. co. us <br />RE: Supplemental Comments Regarding GCC Energy, LLC, King Coal Mine, Permit No. <br />C-1981-035, TRs 20 23, 24, 25 and 26, and <br />Response to Midterm Review <br />Dear Ms. Reilley: <br />As you know, our law firm represents Crosscreek Ranch, LLC, a neighbor of the King Coal <br />mining operation. Our clients consider King Coal a neighbor, and want to extend them <br />every courtesy as such. Crosscreek Ranch also hopes to be treated as a neighbor in <br />return. <br />We hope that you will consider this as a supplement to our previous correspondence on <br />this subject. <br />To reiterate, the company has been operating without the required local land use <br />permit. <br />It is a very interesting question how an operation of this nature has expanded so <br />dramatically without any kind of public review by any agency of government. <br />The dramatic changes in this permit have been improperly treated as Technical <br />Revisions rather than Permit Amendments, thus allowing them to proceed without the <br />public being aware, and without adequate public participation. <br />Colorado Revised Statutes says, at 34-33-103 (27); 'Technical revision" means a minor <br />change, including incidental boundary revisions, to the terms Or requirements of a <br />permit issued under this article, which change shall not cause a significant alteration in <br />the operator's reclamation plan." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.