My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2016-01-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:14:06 PM
Creation date
1/8/2016 1:35:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/5/2016
Doc Name
Danielson Correspondence Regarding Process TR 20, 23, 25, 25, and 26
From
Law office of Luke Danielson
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RAR
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TR -20 alone is a "significant alteration in the operator's reclamation plan. <br />TR -24 is far more than an incidental adjustment to the boundary; it seems it is almost 90 <br />acres, and apparently includes BLM coal not previously under permit. Whether it <br />includes BLM coal not yet under lease, I leave to you and the BLM to sort out. TR 24 <br />would add something like 87.3 acres to the permit area. <br />TR -- 23 is an expansion of production of over SO%. <br />TRs 24 and 25 address surface and groundwater, two of the biggest public concerns <br />about this project. <br />There is also no justification for treating these matters as Technical Revisions, whether <br />considered separately or together. Therefore, we believe that the Division should <br />reconsider its determination and decide that this submittal by GCC (including TRs 20, 23, <br />24, 25 and 26) is more properly reviewed as a Permit Revision. <br />As to the ground and surface water monitoring: <br />• Well clusters should be redesigned to include wells which penetrate below the <br />existing potentiometric surface in order to establish baseline geohydrology and <br />groundwater chemical conditions. <br />• At least some of the wells should be drilled deep enough that they intercept <br />groundwater. <br />• The proposed monitoring parameters should be expanded to better inform <br />baseline groundwater chemistry. These may be inadequate for establishing an <br />adequate water quality baseline of conditions as they exist prior to the <br />expansion of mining into new coal leases. <br />• At least one new alluvial well and surface water monitoring point should be <br />established in Hay Gulch to the south of the current "downgradient" monitoring <br />location. This new monitoring point should be designed to detect possible <br />changes in the hydrology and water chemistry at a point below Schoolhouse <br />Canyon. <br />It would be prudent to establish upgradient and downgradient alluvial <br />groundwater and surface water monitoring stations in East Alkali <br />Gulch. Although the new MW clusters 3 and 4 will be completed to the east of <br />East Alkali Gulch, these wells are not designed to intercept alluvial groundwater. <br />• Core samples from the A seam, overburden, and inter -burden between the A <br />and B seams should be collected and tested for potentially acid generating <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.