My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-27_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-08-27_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:06:53 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:57:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/27/2012
Doc Name
Order Designating Appeal Record 2010 CV 548
From
District Court, Montrose County Colorado
To
Parties
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. A <br />�4,;4, <br />�LJ <br />C \ <br />C-1 � $1 - <br />,°r' E <br />uQI2, ? 12-ol 2- <br />DISTRICT COURT, MONTROSE COUNTY, COLORADO <br />Court Address: 1200 N. Grand Avenue <br />EFILED Document <br />CO Montrose County District Court 7th <br />Montrose, CO 81401 <br />Telephone: (970) 252 -4300 <br />Filing Date: Aug 27 2012 04:51PM MDT <br />Filing ID: 46125214 <br />Review Clerk: N/A <br />FRANK MORGAN, MARY LOU MORGAN, <br />JOELLEN TURNER, AND MICHAEL MORGAN, <br />Plaintiffs, <br />V. <br />❑ COURT USE ONLY ❑ <br />WESTERN FUELS COLORADO, LLC, a Colorado <br />limited liability company, and STATE OF <br />COLORADO, by and through the DEPARTMENT OF <br />Case Number: 2010 CV 548 <br />NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION, MINING & SAFETY and MINED <br />Division: <br />LAND RECLAMATION BOARD, <br />Defendants. <br />ORDER DESIGNATING APPEAL RECORD c 6 ,, 5-4 <br />THE COURT, having reviewed the designations of record filed by the parties, the <br />objections Plaintiffs' designation filed by Defendants, the two motions to strike filed by <br />Defendants, Plaintiffs' response /reply, the applicable law and the history of the case, the Court <br />finds, concludes and orders as follows: <br />The Court generally agrees with the reasoning of Plaintiffs. If Defendants' argument <br />were accepted, then the Court could not review actions taken by Defendants to exclude evidence <br />or disregard evidence, no matter how arbitrary or contrary to law, simply because the evidence <br />would not have been considered by Defendants. The Court does not agree with Defendants' <br />interpretation of the law in this regard. Although judicial review is generally based on the record <br />of the proceeding below, the Court is also charged with making sure that constitutional and <br />statutory rights have been protected, and that procedural fairness has been afforded. C.R.S. 24- <br />4 -106 (7). Failure to consider evidence can be grounds for reversal of an agency action. <br />Platinum Properties Corp. v. Colorado Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 738 P.2d 34 (Colo. App. <br />1987). In addition, the record shall consist of a number of items whether specifically considered <br />by the agency at a hearing or not. C.R.S. 24 -4 -106 (6). <br />IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: <br />ID <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.