My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-08-13_REVISION - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2013-08-13_REVISION - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:23:46 PM
Creation date
8/14/2013 1:22:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/13/2013
Doc Name
Adequacy Response Review
From
DRMS
To
Twentymile Coal Company
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 6 of 12 <br />area acres associated with the Phase II portion of the RDA expansion. This response is <br />adequate. <br />4. Division Initial Comment: Page 2.03 -19.1 lists the violations required by Rule <br />2.03.5(3). Please update the list of violations within the last 3 years. Please update the <br />list of violations within the last 3 years. <br />TC Response: The referenced text has been reviewed, and accurately reflects the <br />information and status of any violations received during the prior three -year period (last <br />violation was received in September 2011), so no update is necessary. <br />Division Response: This response is adequate. <br />Division Initial Comment: Pages 2.03 -36 through 37.1 identify other applicable permits <br />required for C- 1982 -056. Please provide any updates to identify current permits, revised <br />permits, and new permits. <br />TC Response: The referenced text has been reviewed and updated, as appropriate. <br />Copies of the revised pages accompany these responses for replacement in the PAP. <br />Division Response: This response is adequate. <br />6. Division Initial Comment: It appears that proposed pages 2.04 -9.2 does not correspond <br />with text on page 2.04 -10. Please revise the text. <br />TC Response: The referenced text pages have been reviewed and revised, as appropriate <br />for consistency and continuity. Copies of the revised pages accompany these responses <br />for replacement in the PAP. <br />Division Response: This response is adequate. <br />7. Division Initial Comment: Minor Revision No(s). 256 and 261 were approved for <br />developmental drilling within the Foidel Creek Permit Boundary. Per Rule 4.07.3(3), <br />within 60 days after abandoning a drill hole the operator shall submit an abandonment <br />report. If all drilling for the above referenced Minor Revisions or any other drillhole that <br />has been abandoned, please submit the appropriate abandonment reports. <br />TC Response: Not all of the subj ect drillholes were actually drilled. For the 2011 <br />Drilling Program (NMI 1-256), Drillholes TCW001, 003, and 007 were actually <br />completed. For the 2012 Drilling Program (MR12 -261), Drillholes TCW008, 009, and <br />010 were actually completed. Copies of the abandonment reports for these drillholes <br />accompany these responses for your files. <br />Division Response: The Division has reviewed the submitted drillhole abandonment <br />reports and found them to be in compliance with Rule 4.07.3(3). This response is <br />adequate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.