Laserfiche WebLink
6/10/2013 14:0914:09 <br />Jones, Dennis D. <br />From: Jones, Dennis D. <br />Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 15:30 <br />To: 'Morgan - CDPHE, Kelly' <br />Subject: cdps co- 0048275 potential noncompliance issue at outfall 003 <br />Attachments: npdes3 041913.pdf <br />Kelly, <br />I first reviewed today (5/3) data from ACZ Labs, with results for our 4/19/13 sample at Outfall 003 for the Peabody Sage <br />Creek Mine (PSCM), CO- 0048275. The lab data indicates that we may potentially be out of compliance of our DMR limit <br />for potentially dissolved (PD) selenium (Se), 4.6 ug /I. The lab data indicates a value of 4.9 ug /I for PD Se. The total <br />recoverable (TR) Se value is also 4.9 ug /I. Therefore, we do not suspect any matrix interferences with this particular <br />sample. The lab data is attached to this email. <br />The Se limit stated both on the DMR and the discharge permit (issued 3/31/10) is 4.6 ug /I. However, The Reasonable <br />Potential (RP) analysis performed for this permit (in the Rationale dated 2/4/10 by Andrew Nuehart) indicates that Se <br />should be 'monitored' only. Therefore, I feel that the limit set in the permit is incorrect. I have included (in the <br />attachment) that page of the Rationale, and the permit page indicating the limits. This inconsistency between the <br />Rationale and the permit was just discovered by me today. <br />Furthermore, this is the first excursion of the 4.6 ug /I Se standard since monitoring began at this outfall in 1980. The <br />highest previous values were 4.0 ug /I TR on 6/10/96 and 3.1 ug /I PD on 3/9/11. Footnote 4 to Table III ( Metal <br />Parameters) in the Colorado WQCC Regulation 31, ( first referenced in 7`h paragraph of Section 31.22 E (as Footnote 5 in <br />an older version)), states: <br />"Both acute and chronic numbers adopted as stream standards are levels not to be exceeded more than once every <br />three years on average. " <br />The flexibility for determining compliance of the stream standards for Se is not reflected in the Se effluent limits that were <br />established for Outfall 003. One effluent limit exceedance in 33 years at this outfall is below the expected exceedance <br />frequency adopted for metal standards. <br />We have not determined the cause of the excursion, however, the facility and outfall are being properly operated and <br />maintained. This possible exceedance occurred during spring snowmelt and runoff, similar to the conditions that <br />occurred during the alleged prior selenium exceedances. Due to these climatic and hydrologic factors, the high selenium <br />levels may be contributed by other sources. As you know part of sampling activities is to identify and quantify such <br />sources. In addition, we did get about 2 inches (melted water equivalent) of late, heavy snow in April prior to the <br />sampling event. <br />I talked to Kelly Morgan with the WQCD about this at 10:05 AM today. PSCM considers these to be our CDPS permit <br />required 24 hour notification. The permit requires that we also submit within 5 days a written report. If this email does <br />NOT fulfill that requirement, please let me know, and I will follow up with a mail letter. <br />Thank you, <br />Dennis Jones <br />Hydrologist - Seneca Coal Co. <br />970 - 276 -5209 <br />d-iones(@peabodyenergy.com <br />