2013-07-24_HYDROLOGY - M2012032

• Permit No: M2012032
• IBM Index Class Name: HYDROLOGY
• Doc Date: 7/24/2013
• Doc Name: WATER QUALITY REPORTS 2013, 2ND QUARTER
• From: SILVER STAR RESOURCES
• To: DRMS
• Email Name: RCO
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

ACZ Laboratories, Inc.
2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493
Star Mine Operations LLC ACZ Project ID: L12887
L12887 -02 WG346694 Iron, total M200.7 ICP
WG346886 Molybdenum, dissolved M200.81CP -MS
WG346994
Chloride
SM4500CI -E
WG346890
Cyanide, total
M335.4 - Colorimetric w/
distillation
WG346875
Cyanide, WAD
SM4500 -CN I- Colorimetricw/
distillation
WG346650
Fluoride
SM450OF -C
WG346196 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic
Add
M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic
Add
M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic
Add
WG346442 Residue, Filterable (TDS) (eti3180C SM2540C
WG346439 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D
L12887 -03 WG346886
WG346994
WG346890
WG346875
WG346650
WG346196
Molybdenum, dissolved
Chloride
Cyanide, total
Cyanide, WAD
Fluoride
Phosphorus, ortho dissolved
M200.8 ICP-MS
SM4500CI -E
M335.4 - Colorimetric w/
distillation
SM4500 -CN I- Cdorimetricw/
distillation
SM450OF -C
M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic
Add
M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic
Add
M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic
Acid
WG346442 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C
WG346439 Residue, Nan - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D
REPAD.15.06.05.01
M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte
concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike
level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS
or LFB) was acceptable.
M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte
concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike
level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS
or LFB) was acceptable.
M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the
associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable.
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the
associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable.
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
ZU Analysis dateltime preceeds filter date/time. A portion of
sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a
Filter workgroup.
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte
concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike
level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS
or LFB) was acceptable.
M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the
associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable.
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the recovery of the
associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable.
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
ZU Analysis date/time preceeds filter date/time. A portion of
sample was filtered and analyzed prior to the creation of a
Filter workgroup.
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL).
RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data
validation because the sample concentration is too low for
accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL).
Page 24 of 29