Laserfiche WebLink
military bases where a lot of field exercises occur. The persistent disturbance simply <br />makes land highly vulnerable to these opportunistic "devil" plants and these plants are <br />very good at capitalizing on opportunity. <br />Individual Reclamation Areas: This new section which was added last year will not be <br />used this year. As there are no new reclamation areas and the older ones were released upon approval <br />by DRMS, this section will return to use in future annual reports as new reclamation is implemented. <br />F. Description of animal impacts on revegetation: No significant animal impacts <br />were noted. Pronghorn do graze the older revegetation, but the pronghorn population is <br />small relative to the amount of land that produces food for them. Therefore, any <br />impacts are negligible. Rodents, mainly prairie dogs, are not a problem in any of the <br />revegetation areas. Prairie dog impacts on this land tend to be a mixture of both good <br />and bad effects. First, prairie dogs, as is well known, tend to till the soil bringing <br />nutrients locked deep in the soil to the surface and also improving water infiltration. <br />Second, the prairie dog towns on this site, in recent years, have generally devastated <br />the natural vegetation and often have inflicted more damage than was seen by <br />overgrazing. One new prairie dog town adjacent to some old reclamation work exhibits <br />very sparse growth and severely cropped grasses while, at the same time, the reclaimed <br />mined land is in excellent condition with tall, dense grasses and forbs. In fact, it is so <br />bad one person on a recent inspection thought the prairie dog town was the land that <br />had been mined. That is not the case and, in fact, prairie dogs generally do not invade <br />reclaimed land. It is not known why that is the case, but it probably has to do with the <br />suitability of the reclaimed soil to be used for building burrows. <br />The reclaimed soils are comparatively new and therefore lack the density and structural <br />variations of natural soils and likely do not hold up when tunneled. This lower density <br />may be a factor in determining the exact plant species composition on reclaimed soil as <br />compared to unmined soil. As the plant species, irrespective of the numerical <br />relationships, are certainly edible for prairie dogs, unsuitable vegetation composition <br />can be ruled out as the factor limiting prairie dog invasion of reclaimed land. <br />The plant species on reclaimed and unmined land may be the same, but the numerical <br />structure of the vegetation components are almost always different until soil sorting <br />processes can create the fine structure of the natural soils. So, even though the <br />vegetation is attractive to prairie dogs, they avoid it because they do not want to be that <br />far from home to find food for fear they would become food. <br />A major soil development process that creates that structure is called illuviation. <br />Illuviation is a process that carries fine particles deeper into the soil to produce higher <br />density soils below the surface. This becomes a major factor in constructing mature <br />soil profiles and different horizons in the soil. As this process only occurs to any <br />significant degree when precipitation exceeds evaporation, the creation of dense deep <br />soils capable of maintaining a prairie dog burrow without collapsing takes a very long <br />time. If drought is the rule, as has been the case in the last decade, illuvial sorting is <br />simply not occurring to any extent except in locations where runoff accumulates and <br />Status report for 2013 due July 15, 2013 Page 9 of 16 <br />