My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2013-07-11_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:24 PM
Creation date
7/12/2013 8:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/11/2013
Doc Name
Annual Status Report July 15, 2013
From
Mark Heifner
To
DRMS
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. Status of older revegetation as of report date (describe growth rates, cover, invasive <br />species, native invasion, and difficulties) - In June 2012, all older revegetation sites <br />that had not been released were inspected by the Division of Reclamation, Mining and <br />Safety (DRMS). All areas were approved for release. Therefore, these areas are no <br />longer covered by bond and now fall under the purview of the lease requirements only. <br />Although these areas are no longer of any significance for the Reclamation Permit, <br />responsibility for these areas under the lease still exists. Examination of the released <br />lands this year showed the effects of drought last year with reduced seed production and <br />therefore less increase in density than has been seen in the past. Part of the reduced <br />increase in density is due to the current vegetation approaching a closure with respect to <br />the local environment. Thus, most changes involve the dynamics of the vegetation and <br />the slow process of sifting out species incapable of long term survival due to the effects <br />of selection during times of intense stress. As a result, species that are able to survive <br />those extremes slowly take over the land vacated by those who depart. <br />Due to the wet spring this year, inspection in early July showed that the needlegrasses <br />will likely have an excellent seed production year which could translate into an even <br />greater amount of needlegrass in the vegetation. This trend will result in better <br />convergence of the reclamation vegetation with the characteristic moderate to locally <br />high amount of needlegrass in the natural vegetation. Needlegrasses in the surrounding <br />undisturbed vegetation also show strong growth and flowering this year. <br />In more moist, level sites western wheatgrass, as expected, tends to dominate and it <br />appears it will also have a good seed year. <br />On the downside, cheatgrass, as noted elsewhere in this report, is having a banner year. <br />The amount of cheatgrass in reclamation areas is similar to or even slightly less than <br />many areas in the natural vegetation. This ubiquitous species that inhabits the entire <br />Lowry Range continues to be a serious problem with no solution readily available. It <br />will likely continue to be a problem, especially in years with a wet spring, for the <br />foreseeable future and probably well beyond until research is able to develop a remedy <br />to control the species and bring back the millions and millions of acres of cheatgrass <br />devastated land throughout the western United States. Fortunately, on the Lowry Range <br />the existing natural vegetation is presently quite strong and continues to hold its own <br />against even intense growths of cheatgrass. This may be the case because most years are <br />not especially favorable for cheatgrass and, in fact, favors the species composing the <br />natural vegetation. If grazing is reintroduced to this area then it will be important to <br />watch the cheatgrass population and be careful to not open the vegetation structure so <br />much that cheatgrass begins to win the competition war. One of many factors in the <br />abundance of cheatgrass on the property is likely due to years and years of overgrazing <br />which weakened the vegetation so much that the cheatgrass was able to become <br />dominant frequently enough to persist most everywhere. However, cheatgrass was <br />probably a problem even before grazing when the Army used this land for military <br />exercises. Military exercises seem to be just the thing that invasive weeds need to <br />achieve dominance. Fort Carson has horrible invasive weed problems as do most <br />Status report for 2013 due July 15, 2013 Page 8 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.