My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-07-10_INSPECTION - M1978283
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1978283
>
2013-07-10_INSPECTION - M1978283
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:22:22 PM
Creation date
7/11/2013 3:45:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978283
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
7/10/2013
Doc Name
INSPECTION REPORT
From
DRMS
To
OPERATOR
Inspection Date
6/20/2013
Email Name
TOD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M -1978 -283 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: TOD <br />INSPECTION DATE: June 20, 2013 <br />INSPECTION TOPIC: Revegetation <br />PROBLEM /POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: Tamarisk (salt cedar) trees are present within or have volunteered <br />into the permit area and are becoming established. This is a problem for failure to employ weed control <br />methods for a state listed noxious weed species within the permitted area, and to reduce the spread of weeds <br />to nearby areas as required by Section 3.1.10 (6) of the rule. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The operator shall either implement the existing weed control plan, or develop a weed <br />control and management plan in accordance with Section 3.1.10 (6) of the Rule. This plan should be developed <br />in consultation with the county extension agency, or weed control district office and should include specific <br />control measures to be applied, a schedule for when control measures will be applied and a post- treatment <br />monitoring plan. This weed control plan shall be submitted to the Division as a Technical Revision to the <br />approved plan with the appropriate Technical Revision fee of $216.00 by the corrective action date. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 8/09/13 <br />INSPECTION TOPIC: Signs & Markers <br />PROBLEM /POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: A mine I.D. sign was located at the entrance to the mine site, <br />however the sign was not legible. This is a problem for failure to post a mine identification sign as required by <br />Section 3.1.12(1) of the rule. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The operator shall, at the entrance of the mine site, post a sign which shall be clearly <br />visible from the access road with the following: the name of the operator, a statement that a reclamation <br />permit for the operation has been issued by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board; and the permit <br />number. The operator shall submit photo documentation that a proper sign has been posted by the corrective <br />action date. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 8/09/13 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.