My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-06-24_REVISION - M1990057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1990057
>
2013-06-24_REVISION - M1990057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:36 PM
Creation date
6/24/2013 3:50:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/24/2013
Doc Name
AM-01 ADEQUACY REVIEW - 1
From
DRMS
To
OPERATOR
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
MAC
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />June 24, 2013 <br />Nick Michael <br />Union Milling Company, LLC <br />P.O. Box 620490 <br />Littleton, CO 80162 <br />Re: Leadville Mill; DRMS File No. M- 1990 -057; Amendment No. 1 — Adequacy <br />Review No. 1 <br />Dear Mr. Michael, <br />COLORADO <br />D IV IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />- <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has completed its preliminary adequacy review <br />of your 110d Hard Rock Reclamation Permit Amendment Application. The application was <br />received on April 19, 2013 and called complete for review on May 3, 2013. The Decision date <br />for this application is August 2, 2013. Please be advised that if you are unable to satisfactorily <br />address any concerns identified in this review before the decision date, it will be your <br />responsibility to request an extension of the review period. If there are outstanding issues <br />that have not been adequately addressed prior to the end of the review period, and no <br />extension has been requested, the Division will deny this application. <br />In general the application was substantially adequate; however, as with most applications there <br />are a few items that will require the submittal of additional information or clarification of the <br />existing information. Inadequacies are identified under the respective exhibit heading along with <br />suggested actions to correct them. <br />1. The Division received comments from the Colorado Historical Society. The letter is enclosed <br />for your review. Please address the comments noted in the letter, and make any changes in <br />the application as necessary. <br />6.3.1 Exhibit A — Legal Description and Location Map <br />2. The coordinates provided for the primary mine entrance which were provided in Exhibit A <br />do not match the coordinates which were provided on the Application Form. Please clarify <br />which coordinates are for the primary mine entrance. <br />6.3.2 Exhibit B — Site Description <br />3. The Applicant has provided comments from the Division of Wildlife (DOW) dated July 1, <br />2011. The Division notified Union Milling Company that the Leadville Mill would be a <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.