2013-05-09_PERMIT FILE - M2013023 (2)

Home Browse Search

6.3.5 EXHIBIT E - Map 6. On page 4, Exhibit E the application submitted to the Division reads "There are no significant, valuable, and permanent man -made structures with -in 200 feet of the affected area. Therefore, there are no structures identified in any exhibit or any maps included in this application." Please see comments in Exhibit B regarding the permanent man -made structures. 7. Please correct the scale on map M -2. The scale given indicates that %" = 150'. The map provided shows the southern portion of the permit boundary has a length of 860'. When the map is measured with a ruler the result is approximately 4.05" which results in a length of 810'. 8. Please resolve the apparent discrepancy between page 3 of Exhibit D (which indicates 4" of topsoil will be replaced) and on page 3 Exhibit E (which indicates 8" of topsoil will be replaced). 9. In order to sufficiently describe the post- mining topography, please add contour lines that show the approximate gradient of all reclaimed slopes. 10. Please resolve the apparent discrepancy between the NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report (which indicates there is an existing excavation within the proposed permit boundary) and on page 4 Exhibit E (which states "There are no previously mined areas, roads, or excavations resulting from utility construction on the proposed site. "). General Comments and questions 11. Please submit the application form with the correct spelling of the business trade name; the Division's records indicate that the applicant is registered with the Secretary of State as "RIVERSIDE AGGREGATES, LLC" the application submitted to the Division reads "Riverside Aggregates LLC ". Please resolve this apparent discrepancy. 12. The Division suggests using a standard scale of 1" = 100' on all maps. 13. The Division also suggests adding a standard one -inch long bar to each drawing, indicating that if the bar measures something different than one inch, the user can determine if the scale has been altered from the original drawing. 14. The application form indicates the post- mining land use is pastureland. Is this an accurate classification or would rangeland be a more appropriate classification? Please describe the desired post- mining land use. The current decision deadline for this application is May 31, 2013. Please provide responses to the above comments soon enough for the Division to review the responses and complete a follow -up exchange of comments and responses prior to the decision deadline. If you are unable to provide satisfactory responses to any inadequacies prior to the decision deadline, it will be your responsibility to request an extension of time to allow for continued review of this application. If there are still unresolved issues when the decision date arrives and no extension has been requested, the application will be denied.