My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-05-01_REVISION - M1978116 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978116
>
2013-05-01_REVISION - M1978116 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 3:13:10 PM
Creation date
5/8/2013 2:47:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978116
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/1/2013
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO SECOND ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
COTTER
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
THM
TC1
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to DRMS Adequacy Rex iew (2) — Cotter SM -18 Mine Reclamation Plan Amendment <br />S. On Page D -6 under Item g, it is stated that additional roads will be built to access <br />ventilation shafts as needed As stated in item number 2 of this review, the revised Figure <br />C2 legend shows the only added feature is the vent hole located approximately 450' west <br />of the lease's eastern boundary. Please veri,,(y that this is the case. <br />See response to question #2 above. <br />Exhibit F <br />6 The revised Figures Fl and F2 address the original adequacy issues by removing the <br />topsoil stockpile and displaying contour lines thatportray the site topography. Please <br />submit signed revised Figures Fl and F2. <br />Stamped, signed copies of Figures F1 and F2 are included as Attachment 4. <br />Environmental Protection Plan <br />7. Regarding the radiometric survey submitted. Please clarify the highest levels detected. <br />According to the survey figures provided in attachment 6 areas that are black are greater <br />than 120 uR,hr_ <br />The highest reading noted in reviewing the radiometric scan data was 751 VX/hr. <br />Drainaae Plan <br />1. Page ESWMP -5, section 7.2. The NOAA Atlas 2, Volume 111 charts provided in the <br />attachments are illegible due to the small scale. Please state the specific design storm <br />depths used for runoff analyses for both the 10 year and 100 year, 24 -hour events. <br />The design storm precipitation depths used in the analysis for this site are 1.9 <br />inches and 3.0 inches, respectively, for the 10 year and 100 -year 24 -hour <br />events. This information was taken from the NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume III, <br />isopluvial charts. <br />2. Page ESWMP -5, section 7.3. This section states the surface soils at the site are <br />considered Hydrologic Soils Group (HSG) B, but no specific references are given. The <br />soil types on Figure U5 indicate the natural soils in the area defined by the subbasins <br />analyzed are "23'; Bodot, and "88'; rock outcrop- orthenis complex. According to the soil <br />survey in Exhibit 1, the Bodot soil profile is described as "0 to 3 inches Cobbly clay <br />loam ", and "3 to 30 inches Cobbly silty clay ". Both clay loam and silty clay are <br />considered HSG D, as are rock outcrops. Furthermore, the Soil Survey of San Miguel <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.