My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-04-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 8:39:19 AM
Creation date
4/23/2013 10:44:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/8/2013
Doc Name
East Pit Recl Sequencing & Ditch Designs for Prospect Ditch, N Tribut E Pit Ditch & Final E Pit Ditc
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 07 Item 14 Appendix Exh7-14R
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Reach 1 is 3.8 fps. These peak velocities are below the maximum allowable velocity of 5 <br />fps for the vegetative cover lining. <br />gtnrk Pnnrlc <br />In order to assure compliance with effluent requirements at the outlet of Prospect Pond, <br />up to 5 stock tanks have been constructed near the re- established main drainage channels <br />of Prospect Ditch, North Tributary East Pit Ditch, and Final East Pit Ditch. Three of <br />these (PD -1, PD -2, and NTEP -1) were constructed in 2010, one in 2011 (EP -1). The <br />other stock pond (EP -2) was constructed in 2012. <br />For all stock ponds PD -1, PD -2, NTEP -1, EP -1, and EP -2, actual as -built surveys of <br />volume v.s. elevation were used in the SEDCAD model. For simplicity of design and <br />operation, and as a conservative consideration, all ponds were assumed to be brim -full at <br />the start of the precipitation event, thereby minimizing their flow attenuating effect on the <br />runoff in the design storm. <br />Reclamation Time Frame Evaluated <br />Although three distinct reclamation time frames were required for the sediment pond <br />modeling presented separately in Exh. 7 -14PP, only the 2017 time frame is evaluated <br />here. This represents the time when all of the final PMT watershed has been returned to <br />final grade and is reporting to the drainage system, and all previous in —pit interception of <br />runoff has ceased. Some of the uppermost sub - watersheds are still in a high runoff <br />condition (e.g. CN =85). This represents a worst case assumption for the permanent ditch <br />system, as those upper areas will revert to CN =74 once the revegetation reaches its third <br />year of growth. <br />Exh. 7 -14R -3 Revision Date: 3/27/13 <br />Revision No. TR -97 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.