Laserfiche WebLink
each reference area individually, the reclaimed area would thus pass the weighted herbaceous <br />production performance standard. <br />A two - sample t -test of Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the assertion that the <br />2012 BRB -5 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Mountain Brush Reference Area <br />allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />d <br />where: SE, = <br />gi b,. — 0,97, <br />(0.9* <br />976,1 — (0.9 P 214.5) <br />— 7.608 <br />0870 49 + (0.81 - 19516.09) <br />35 31 <br />d _.. = <br />(0.9 - SFrfr�4 <br />" f <br />1 308 40.;9 (0.S1.1951 <br />55 + 31 <br />( 161.52 4 (0,9 25 09) <br />35- 1 i_ 1 <br />2 8: r 2 8 <br />Since critical t = 0.855 (one - tailed, alpha = 0.2, 28 df and tca,c (7.608) is greater than this critical value, <br />the hypothesis of no difference is rejected and reclamation success for Phase III herbaceous production <br />relative to the 2012 Mountain Brush Reference area is demonstrated. <br />A two - sample t -test of Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the assertion that the <br />2012 BRB -5 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Sagebrush Reference Area <br />allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />27 <br />