My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-03-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977215
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1977215
>
2013-03-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:18:51 PM
Creation date
3/28/2013 11:25:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977215
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/27/2013
Doc Name
Appeal of Notice of Pending Designation as a DMO.
From
Rio Grande Silver, Inc.
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
AJW
GRM
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Rio Grande Silver, Inc. <br />ACZ ID W KRUPA PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />Q <br />RIPTION <br />L11050 - WG340757 Arsenic (1312) <br />WG340729 Banum (1312) <br />WG340476 Beryllium (1312) <br />WG340729 Boron (1312) <br />WG340476 Cadmium (1312) <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />WG340729 Calcium (1312) <br />WG340442 Cobalt (1312) <br />WG340757 Copper (1312) <br />WG340577 Iron (1312) <br />WG340757 Lead (1312) <br />WG340729 Magnesium (1312) <br />WG340442 Manganese (1312) <br />WG340362 Mercury (1312) <br />WG340442 Molybdenum (1312) <br />Nickel (1312) <br />Potassium (1312) <br />WG340476 Selenium (1312) <br />WG340442 Silica (1312) <br />WG340476 Silver (1312) <br />M6020 ICP -MS <br />M6020 ICP -MS <br />Inorganic Extended <br />Qualifier Report <br />ACZ Project ID: L11050 <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />ZB The ICP -MS Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 100 times <br />the MDL <br />M6010B ICP RD For a solid matrix, the duplicate RPD (spike or matrix) <br />exceeded the control limd, which is attributable to the non - <br />homogeneity of the sample <br />M6010B ICP ZG The ICP Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 50 times <br />the MDL <br />M6020 ICP -MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6020 ICP -MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M6020 ICP -MS ZB The ICP -MS Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 100 times <br />the MDL <br />M60106 ICP ZG The ICP Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 50 times <br />the MDL <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6020 ICP -MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6020 ICP -MS ZB The ICP -MS Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 100 times <br />the MDL <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6020 ICP -MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M7470A CVAA RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP ZG The ICP Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 50 times <br />the MDL <br />M6020 ICP -MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />M6010B ICP ZG The ICP Serial Dilution was not used for data validation <br />because the sample concentration was less than 50 times <br />the MDL <br />M6020 ICP -MS RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />Page 30 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.