My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:30 PM
Creation date
3/13/2013 8:04:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/29/2013
Doc Name
page 4-233s to 4-248b
Section_Exhibit Name
4.8 Hydrologic Impacts Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on data from USGS Gauging Station 09247600, Yampa River below Craig, CO) results in an estimated <br />TDS baseline concentration of 280.2 mg/I in the Yampa River below Johnson Gulch. <br />TDS Yampa River = 1000 mg/1(20gpm) + 200 cfs (448.8 qpm/cfs)(280 mg/l) = 280.2 mg/I <br />Below Johnson Gulch (20 gpm + (200 cfs) (448.8 gpm/cfs)) <br />This represents a baseline addition of 0.2 mg/I TDS in the Yampa. This potential variation will be <br />undetectable in the Yampa River due to the much larger natural variations in TDS concentrations that <br />occur. Trapper might develop additional drainages that will contain increased TDS concentrations in spoil <br />spring-derived base flows. However, some of the backfill aquifers at Trapper contain water that is <br />essentially the same quality as the baseline surface water quality (see backfill well GF-5 as compared to <br />the No Name drainage surface water data). Trapper projects that under a worst case scenario where <br />multiple drainages contribute TDS-affected base flows to the Yampa River, TDS concentrations in the <br />Yampa might be increased by approximately one tenth of one percent. The actual increase will probably <br />be significantly less than this due to the likelihood that such small flows from the mine will never reach the <br />Yampa River. <br />The Annual Hydrologic Reports (Appendix W) present summaries and discussions of surface water <br />quality for selected water quality constituents at monitoring locations throughout the project site. <br />4.8.3.2 Groundwater Impacts <br />The following sections present discussions of the probable hydrologic consequences due to mining on <br />groundwater quantity and groundwater quality. These sections are followed by a discussion of the <br />expected impacts to adjudicated wells in the vicinity of the project area. <br />Post-mine Groundwater Quantity <br />The following discussions address the post-mine recharge characteristics of affected aquifers, aquifer <br />restoration, and impacts to flows from springs. <br />Post-mine Recharge: <br />Radian (1981) conducted an infiltration investigation of the spoils at Trapper and predicted that on <br />balance no percolation or resaturation of the spoil aquifers would occur under normal precipitation <br />4-236 <br />PRc <br />I(ze (?i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.