My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2013-01-29_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:30 PM
Creation date
3/13/2013 8:04:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/29/2013
Doc Name
page 4-233s to 4-248b
Section_Exhibit Name
4.8 Hydrologic Impacts Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Where elevated total dissolved solids (TDS) levels exist in the backfill aquifer, elevated TDS levels will be <br />exhibited in base flows derived from the backfill aquifer. To date, Johnson Gulch is the only surface water <br />drainage that definitely shows mining effects on TDS during base flow conditions. The higher TDS base <br />flow concentrations in Johnson Gulch are expected to gradually decline with time as the TDS <br />concentrations in the backfill aquifer decline. This mechanism is described in more detail under the <br />Groundwater Impacts discussion, Section 4.8.3.2. <br />No measurable changes in water quality attributable to mining are anticipated in the Yampa River. The <br />surface water flow rates typically associated with spoil spring discharges are very small during base flow <br />periods and insignificant as compared to the Yampa River flow. The majority of the base flows from the <br />Trapper Mine drainages will not make it to the Yampa River due to infiltration and evaporative losses <br />along the way. <br />Rain and snowmelt that infiltrate the Horse Gulch fill may discharge from the toe of the fill and enter the <br />surface stream. The discharge would flow to a sediment control pond whose discharge is permitted <br />under the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS). <br />A reasonable assumption is that 25% of annual precipitation will infiltrate the fill. This assumption is <br />based on lysimeter studies of spoil infiltration conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey at the Seneca II <br />Mine in Routt County, approximately 14 miles east of the Trapper Mine (U.S. Geological Survey Water <br />Resources Investigations Report 92- 4187). Using this assumption, the average discharge rate of water to <br />the land surface from the toe of the Horse Gulch Fill can be projected to be 31 gallons per minute for <br />several months each year, calculated as follows: <br />115.1 acres X 43,560 cubic feet per acre X 25% infiltration rate X 16.49 inches of <br />precipitation per year X 12 inchestfoot = 1,461,075 cubic feet. <br />If this water discharges over an 8 -month period (243 days), the average discharge rate <br />during that period would be 31 gallons per minute, calculated as follows: (1,461,075 <br />cubic feet X 7.5 gallons per cubic foot) / (243 days X 1440 minutes per day) = 1,461,075 <br />gallons / 349,920 minutes = 31 gpm. <br />The quality of the discharges from the fill can be expected to be similar to Trapper spoil water. This <br />discharge rate and quality is not sufficient to cause exceedances of the CDPS permit or cause material <br />damage to the hydrologic balance. Although discharge from the fill may increase dissolved solids in <br />surface stream flows, the increase will not be sufficient to impair the water for livestock or wildlife use. <br />Major constituents in the base flow in Johnson Gulch are being affected by discharge from the backfill <br />aquifer in this area. The total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations have increased roughly 1000 mg/I <br />over baseline conditions. Typical base flow in Johnson Gulch is approximately 20 gpm (0.045 cfs). <br />Combining this water with typical base flow conditions for the Yampa (200 cfs and 280 mg/l TDS; based <br />4 -235 <br />?kluo <br />6-11z/26#) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.