Laserfiche WebLink
samples following the standard three -well volume purge procedure. While the well <br />bore water level recovery following testing remains slower, higher static water <br />levels provide evidence that the highly disturbed zone in the reclaimed overburden <br />area is recharging. The timeline for this recharge is consistent with previous <br />predictions. <br />Copies of the "Detection Summary" (formerly the "Executive Summary ") of <br />analytical laboratory test results are found in the pages following this text. Each <br />ground water monitoring well was sampled in accordance with the "permit <br />procedure ". The `B" designation following the well identification confirms that the <br />laboratory sample was obtained after initial field sampling, well purging and a <br />subsequent (second) field sampling. The 2012 ground water monitoring test results <br />remain consistent with results from previous year's analyses in that there have been <br />no confirmed statistical exceedences, with but one exception, the samples obtained <br />from the SMW -2 well during 2004. The SMW -2 well is completed in the disturbed <br />spoil material which is being subjected to slow re- saturation by ground water, and <br />appears to be leaching dissolved minerals as the water table rises. This has caused <br />manganese concentrations to somewhat exceed the calculated tolerance limit. CEC <br />addressed this tolerance limit exceedence with CDPHE during 2005, and was <br />granted permission to continue the current detection monitoring program [Doty & <br />Associates letter dated 04/08/05, "Alternate Source Demonstration, Statistically <br />Significant Increase Over Background Manganese in SMW -2, Fourth Quarter <br />2004, Keenesburg Disposal Facility"] . <br />The direction of ground water flow, to the extent that it has been documented in the <br />area of the Keenesburg Mine property, trends downgradient to the northeast. <br />Recharge of the aquifer in the "spoil area" continues to be limited to a single <br />source, the localized infiltration of precipitation to the subsurface. There is no <br />evidence of any significant ground water recharge to the site from the Ennis Draw <br />fluvial ground water system. Ground water elevations in the sampled Ennis Draw <br />wells close to the Keenesburg Mine site are significantly higher than in either the <br />spoil monitoring well (SMW -2) or in the ash monitoring wells (AMW -1 or <br />AMW -2). <br />It is CEC position that no adverse affect on the overall hydrologic balance of the <br />Keenesburg Mine site will result from, a continuation of the ash disposal operation, <br />from the limited addition of mine waste rock to the B -Pit ash disposal, or from the <br />continuing reclamation operations. Ground water levels in the former coal <br />extraction areas should be expected to recover to their approximate pre- mining <br />AHR-2012 <br />-44- <br />