My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-01-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:25 PM
Creation date
1/28/2013 12:56:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/28/2013
Doc Name
Turner Fax regarding Sampling and Data Gathering (TR61)
From
JoEllen Turner and Michael Morgan
To
DRMS and OSM
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MLT
SB1
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JoEllen Turner <br />dust control each year from 2003 -2008 on these properties West of 2700 road. 38 acre feet used <br />for dust control. If you even take HALF of that just strictly our property which it's well over <br />half, that would be approximately 1.6 feet of water across our ENTIRE MINED PROPERTY, <br />(Morgans) STOCKPILES AND ALL. AND, the IMPOSSIBLE millions of gallons that would <br />be used each year, his estimations aren't even close to the actual gallons that this amounts to that <br />v,ras used on our property for dust control. I'm sorry, I'm just a farmer and an EXPERT such as <br />Mr. DeJoia should have been able to figure this one by himself without the help of a little of <br />farmer. <br />Mr. Dejoia states that they had none of these water samples. Again, untrue, they had been taking <br />them all along. Kelly Morgan from the Department of Health also told us that WFC's permit did <br />allow for dilution to get the water to pass. The problem here is that THE PIT WATER USED <br />ON THE MORGAN PROPERTY WAS STRAIGHT PIT WATER AND WAS NEVER AND I <br />MEAN NEVER DILUTED. Mr. DeJoia also would know this if he had checked his OWN <br />resources and if he REALLY HAD WANTED TO PROVIDE ACCURATE AND CORRECT <br />INFORMATION. But, this information was already submitted and pictures to discovery, so this <br />was something that WFC knew for fact and Dejoia also knew and failed to tell you all. He also <br />should be well aware of the fact that they are seeking other sources of water other than pit water <br />for dust control. The problem here is FIRST FILL is pit water. He also is very aware that the <br />salinity or conductivity of this pit water is 10 and 15 times higher in all conductivity and the total <br />TDS than the San Miguel River, which is our irrigation. He should also have been told that Tom <br />Fry jumped our fence where the pivot is on our property and took his WATER SAMPLES to <br />send in for Calamity on our place for a VERY DILUTED sample. This way they could show <br />water with low values so they could pass their test. I also sent these water samples to OTHER <br />labs and guess what, the same results. That if drank, it could kill you. Not fit for livestock, <br />domestic, or irrigation, or for any purpose. This is also DOCUMENTED almost word for word <br />by the State and by WFC in past permits. <br />WFC also submitted into discovery that this pit water contains arsenic, alkaline, high salt, iron, <br />mercury and the list goes on and on. This is their own documents. <br />So, this only allows us to form one conclusion, Mr. DeJoia is bought and paid for. He has no <br />desire nor any goals to protect and preserve prime farmland and there is a rule that covers <br />everything that WFC and Mr. DeJoia is doing. 1.04 a willful violation and willfully. And 1.04 <br />Knowingly and 1.04 Unwarranted failure to comply. Indifference and the lack of diligence. <br />And lastly the failure to comply with a direct Board Order. I am objecting to Pr -07, Permit <br />renewal number 6 and Bond release on the properties I have stated in prior letters, and requesting <br />an informal hearing on all, if proceedings for Pr - 07 continue. <br />JoEllen turner <br />per,) ( %‘.M ,I4 <br />' Y 1- \ <br />970 - 864 -7682 p.4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.