My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-28_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-01-28_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:28 PM
Creation date
1/28/2013 12:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/28/2013
Doc Name
Turner Pettion
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR7
Email Name
MLT
SB1
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Permit Revision No. 7 of New Horizon Permit Number C-81 -008 <br />This is a petition to the objection of Permit Revision 7. The Morgan property has <br />always been one of the nicer and most productive farms in this area. The Morgan farm has <br />always been historically irrigated and cropped and has been considered as prime farmland. <br />Permit Revision number 6 `Board Ordered" Western Fuels to return all of the Morgan property <br />to prime farmland standards. NRCS has unanimously stated that all of the Morgan ro <br />was mined was Prime Farmland. The Court has entered a Judgement P PAY that <br />violations of the Rules and Regulations governing against Western Fuels for <br />The Morgan property needs to be restored to the pr farmland standards that it had prior lease to <br />mining and reclaimed according to prime farmland rules and re f the <br />to <br />Morgan property should be allowed to be changed from the prime h �an d d termin ti the <br />has already been approved. Rules and eemvnation that <br />regulations governing this are 2.04.12, a prime farmland <br />Investigation that had to be completed prior to mining. 2.06 The National soils survey handbook <br />had to be used to make that determination and NRCS bad to be contacted 1.04 The Morgan <br />property was always historically irrigated and cropped, not pasturelands since 1987. 4.25 The <br />soils had to be segregated and protected, until redistribution and were not. The operations for <br />prime farmland are very specific and these decisions had to all be agreed upon and approved <br />prior to any mining activities. The mining on the Morgan property is completed and final <br />baekfilling is being done and to change their prime farmland determination for an <br />g portion of <br />that property after the fact is inappropriate and is being objected to. The following people have <br />all read this and this is a formal objection to any changes that Pr - presents that changes any of <br />Pie Ask_ 410) - <br />the Morgan property to less than the prime farmland that they had prior tq mining. <br />r <br />C-- <br />U Frvla. . 1'i44 ( )P �X-1- 5 rizeds / <br />? , Li - b 0.c((_ + ci aL T{x.S caul Oi . <br />iL1 it v � , l 1 01.4_1( £; - c t e /4 - itZ L <br />Z'd Z89L-t799-0L6 aeuani uellao <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.