Laserfiche WebLink
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Golder Associates <br />ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />QUAL DESCRIPTION <br />L97854 -04 WG334551 Chloride <br />WG334369 Fluoride <br />WG334153 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG334204 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG334551 Sulfate <br />L97854 -05 WG334551 Chloride <br />WG334202 Total Alkalinity <br />L97854 -06 WG334551 Chloride <br />WG334369 Fluonde <br />WG334153 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />WG334369 Fluoride <br />WG334153 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />WG334202 pH SM4500H+ B <br />WG334204 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />SM2320B - Titration <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />ZO <br />DC <br />D1 <br />DC <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />ZW <br />ZO <br />ZW <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />Inorganic Extended <br />Qualifier Report <br />ACZ Project ID: L97854 <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg <br />Sample required dilution Non - target analyte exceeded <br />calibration range <br />Sample required dilution due to matnx <br />Sample required dilution Non - target analyte exceeded <br />calibration range <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Method deviation The sample was centnfuged prior to <br />analysis due to high solid content <br />Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg <br />Method deviation The sample was centnfuged prior to <br />analysis due to high solid content <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Page 22 of 34 <br />