My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-24_PERMIT FILE - M2012045
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2012045
>
2013-01-24_PERMIT FILE - M2012045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2017 9:31:19 AM
Creation date
1/25/2013 12:45:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012045
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/24/2013
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Reponse
From
LJ Development, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPLICATION <br />1. Page 4 — Based on the proposed phased bonding approach and the ultimate goal <br />of a developed water resource post -mine land use, the "Developed Water Resources" box <br />should be checked under Item 12 of the application. Please submit a revised page 4. <br />Response : <br />The applicant is proposing that the post mining land use to be rangeland, therefore <br />page 4 of the application is correct and does not need to be altered. <br />6.4 SPECIFIC EXHIBIT REQUIREMENTS — REGULAR 112 OPERATIONS <br />The following items must be addressed by the applicant in order to satisfy the requirements <br />of C.R.S. 34- 32.5 -101 et seq. and the Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board: <br />6.4.1 EXHIBIT A — Legal Description <br />This exhibit is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.2 EXHIBIT B — Index Map <br />This exhibit is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.3 EXHIBIT C - Pre - mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br />2. All three maps in Exhibit C imply Nyberg Road is intended to be included in the <br />permit boundary. The Division acknowledges that the pre- mining map includes a detail <br />illustrating the Stonewall Springs Quarry property boundary, but it is not clear as to the <br />intent of the permit boundary. Please clarify the Applicant's intent to include or exclude <br />Nyberg Road in the permit boundary. If the intent is to include the road, please provide a <br />source for the legal right of entry. <br />Response : <br />Nyberg road is a Pueblo County Road and is not intended to be included in the <br />permit boundary. The Pre - Mining Map has been revised to show that Nyberg <br />Road is excluded and not part of the permitted area. <br />3. Exhibit C Adjoining Landowners — US Highway 50 /State Highway 96 appears <br />to be within 200 feet of the proposed permit boundary. The Division assumes this <br />highway is owned by the Colorado Dept. of Transportation (CDOT), but they are not <br />identified as an adjacent landowner. Please identify the owner of the highway on Sheet 2 <br />of 2 and provide proof of notification. <br />Response: <br />US Highway 50/ State Highway 96 is within the 200 feet of the proposed <br />permit boundary. The Highways are owned by the Colorado Dept. of <br />Transportation (CDOT). The maps have been corrected and CDOT <br />(Colorado Dept. of Transportation) was notified please see their letter <br />below: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.