Laserfiche WebLink
JoEllen Turner <br />970 - 864 -7682 p.9 <br />information to them, with the truth this time and not all the fraudulent produced <br />information that was given to them in the prior formal hearing. <br />I would like to also know how to get on the Agenda. Thank you <br />The application had to contain PRIOR TO MINING the USES of the and and the land <br />capabilities and a soil survey showing all horizons and depths that support the uses and <br />sail descriptions of the area being mined PRIOR TO MINING!!!! <br />Rules being broke and have been broken. <br />2.04.9(1) Our soils had already been SALVAGED and some stolen. And the so called <br />suitable subsoil had already place and the stockpiles of the so called suitable material <br />were not checked. Some of our soils were stockpiled on Garveys and were not <br />analyzed and some on Bud Bensons and were nt analyzed. <br />34- 33- 114(4) (b) and 34 -33 -110 (2) (q) of the Act Segregation and this was at MINIMUM <br />and was not done. While in 2008 this was done, except in 2010 some of our better C lift <br />was stolen in April. WFC had it planned all along to use Jim Irvines soil survey and the <br />ph discrepancy as a flaw and try and make excuses, but if any one of you had REALLY <br />read even their fabricated version, it states that ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL SOIL <br />SURVEY HANDBOOK, IT WAS PRIME.. If you had really read even the Colorado <br />Farmland Inventory which is what they chose to go by, again against the rules and <br />regulations, it STATES THAT THIS IS FOR SOILS OF LESS THAN 40 INCHES TO <br />BEDROCK. And as demonstrated by their lack of diligence to abide by these rules, they <br />are trying to find ways around them to try and make our property what it was not. Our <br />property was prime farmland designated as such by NRCS and by the USDA and that <br />can not be changed after mining has been completed with a so- called "ASSUMPTION" <br />and I BELIEVE this to be true report. Decisions made on prime farmland and major <br />changes made to a landowners property as well as the approval of any revisions or <br />permits must be BASED ON FACTUAL AND ACCURATE INFORMATION, NOT <br />ASSUMPTIONS AND BELIEFS WHICH ARE NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE <br />LAND OWNERS OWN KNOWLEDGE OF 59 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND <br />DOCUMENTED SCS FACTS AND NRCS FACTS. <br />4.25.3(1) No other material was ever salvaged and protected and segregated to be <br />used as a soil substitute. <br />4.06.2 (4) (A) <br />2,06.6(2) (d) CSU DR. Borch and Dr. Cipra and entire department of specialist <br />regarding our property was ignored. CSU and NRCS documentation and experience <br />and knowledge was ignored. <br />2.04.9(3) and 4.06.2 All violated. These test and analysis had to be done prior to <br />mining. It states where the applicant PLANS to use and 10 later after mining is <br />completed is a violation. The rock fragments alone disqualifies it. The Act also requires <br />EQUIVALENT USES OR HIGHER USES OF THE LAND. ALL OF THIS THAT WFCs IS <br />TRYING TO DO VIOLATES ALL THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND THE <br />LANDOWNERS RIGHTS. <br />4.25.3(2) and 4.06.2(4) (a) Most of all it is a total contradiction to NRCS letters, soil <br />surveys, and reviews which were numerous. <br />A mixed lift is no better than a subsoil and WFC still needs to return our "A" lift to make <br />us whole again. They stole our soils, 196,000 cubic yards of our Barx soils and our soils <br />were not segregated and they were very rich and deep and Pr -07 trying to give us back <br />51. 1 Page <br />