2013-01-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008

Home Browse Search

JoEllen Turner 970 - 864 -7682 p.3 196,000 cubic yards was stolen. He said that he was never told that more than the 22 inch mixed lift was ever available. In fact, he was told that was ALL WFC salvaged was the 22 inch mixed lift pile. Again, he was never given ALL the facts and Dejoia nor Dunker can make a logical determination without ALL the facts and when I say ALL the facts, we were not permitted at the "SIDE" meetings and this was suppose to be a scientific evaluation, but somewhere along the line these hired guns were told that ONLY 20,000 cubic yards were removed, also against the law. They also were not told that PRIME FARMLAND rules and regulations require a "PRIME FARMLAND" investigation PRIOR to mining and that the SOIL SURVEY is only 1/6th of that investigation. They were also told a false hood on the water as well as was the STATE. Mr. Morgan is and always has been the LEADING share holder of the CCC ditch and MR. Morgan OFFERED ROSS GUBKA ON TAPE RIGHT THERE AT THE KITCHEN TABLE SEVERAL TIMES TO GIVE WFC MORE WATER BUT ROSS SAID THAT LANCE DID NOT WANT TO LEASE ANY MORE WATER!!!! We felt that 50 shares would be plenty because that was ALL WE ever used as Mr. Morgan, himself, testified under oath. Avalon soils, what a joke. This is for slopes less than 25 %. Has anyone really read our property. Our slopes were 0 tO 3 %. of course that's Tess than 25 %. But , prime farmland requirements are for slopes less than 6 %. Our slopes were 0 to 3 %. Whats wrong with these people? ZERO TO THREE PERCENT!!!!! And 3-6% slopes Well, dah, that's Tess than 25 %. AGAIN WHERE HAVE THEY EVER READ A PRIME FARMLAND INVESTIGATION RULE ? ?? fOR PRIME FARMLAND THE SLOPES ARE NOT 15% OR LESS OR 25% OR LESS, the slopes are less than 6 %. LESS THAN 6 %. Our slopes were 0 to 3 %. We had Barx 2E soils, not just Barx and not just PRIME FARMLAND, we had the VERY best prime farmland for this area. We didn't have Mivida either. We are not accepting any of this. If they wanted to do a prime farmland investigation, then they should have been here in 1998. If WFC wanted to question any of these determinations made by their own soil scientist, then that needed to be done before they entered the Morgan property just like the Judge said, If they want to question NRCS and USDA reports and documentations, then they should have done those before they ever entered the property. We have USDA reports since 1960, unlike Dejoias lies, 1960 people showing our property with BARX soils and a unanimous decision by the Board, by NRCS, and by OSM has confirmed all of this and not only once, but many documents and we are NOT ACCEPTING THIS SO CALLED IMPROVED MAPPING AND NEW MAPPING AND SOILS THAT DO NOT EVEN INDICATE WHAT WE HAVE HERE!IFII Again Lewicki has NO CLUE. HE states that the average stripping for the Morgan East portion was 22 inches. What lies. What false statements. 22 inches is what they brought BACK to us that was in stockpiles EAST of 2700 road, not what was salvaged. They stockpiled our soils East of 2700 road because there was no place to put the soils while they removing them. These soils were not suppose to leave our property, but were earmarked as ours as we were told until they could bring them back. WFC documented themselves in 2000, read the permit that the AVERAGE depth of our topsoils EXCEEDED 47 inches _ They are being totally ridiculous. FIGURE the maps yours selves. What a totally ridiculous ASSUMPTION with mathematical figures and WFC own documentation already documented. 13 1 Page