My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-22_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2013-01-22_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:16 PM
Creation date
1/23/2013 8:13:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/22/2013
Doc Name
Adequacy Responses
From
Colowyo Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR98
Email Name
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COAL <br />COMPANY 04 <br />• � Op LS • PSODDC[1011 •� <br />The Division has also previously approved text in Colowyo 's PAP which <br />addresses Rule 4.09.1(7). In Exhibit 21, Item 1, Addendum No. 3 -5, Shannon <br />& Wilson 's report addresses a FS for a permanent fill in the conclusions <br />section and it states, "The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />regulations (2005) require a long term FS of 1.5 or greater for permanent <br />spoil fill slopes; they do not specifically address temporary slopes." This <br />statement by a professional engineer and approved by the Division previously <br />sets precedence that the Division agrees that the rules do not address a FS for <br />a temporary spoil pile. <br />In conclusion, Colowyo firmly believes it is meeting all the requirements of <br />the Colorado Mine Land Reclamation Board regulations with the FS that is <br />presented in Addendum 4 of Shannon & Wilson 's report. Additionally, <br />because the rules do not specifically address a FS for a temporary spoil pile, <br />Colowyo feels that a certified professional engineering report presents the <br />best alternative to calculating a FS utilizing current professional judgment <br />and previously approved materials, because the rules do not specifically <br />address an FS for a temporary spoil pile. <br />• Shannon &Wilson's analysis does not address the fact that some of the <br />proposed excess spoil would overlay an area of highwall mining. Please <br />address the potential impact of the additional load from the proposed excess <br />spoil fill on the excavated sections from highwall mining as well as the <br />integrity of the proposed excess spoil fill. <br />Response: In Exhibit 21, Item 1, Addendum No. 3 -6, potential highwall <br />mining impacts have been presented and approved by the Division previously. <br />Colowyo believes this section of the report addressing highwall mining in the <br />vicinity of the proposed spoil pile adequately addresses potential impacts from <br />previously performed highwall mining below the permanent West Taylor Fill. <br />• Please add information to the appropriate text and to Map 45 showing how <br />drainage from the temporary spoil pile will drain to the pit. <br />Response: Per Rule 4.05.2(1), "All surface drainage from the disturbed area <br />is required to be routed through a sedimentation pond or a series of <br />sedimentation ponds, or other treatment facilities before leaving the permit <br />area." Therefore, should Colowyo desire to retain drainage from the <br />temporary spoil pile in pit there are no requirements for Colowyo to <br />A Western Fuels - Colorado, LLC raining property <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.