My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-14_PERMIT FILE - M2012032 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2013-01-14_PERMIT FILE - M2012032 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:04 PM
Creation date
1/14/2013 4:08:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/14/2013
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO STORMWATER ADEQUACY COMMENTS
From
GREG LEWICKI & ASSOCIATES
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
TAK
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRMS Comment <br />Map G -5: General Comments <br />19. Collection ditches are proposed to have 1.5H:1 V side slopes. Side slopes this steep are <br />inherently unstable. Please revise the side slopes to no steeper than 2.5H:1V (3H:1V is <br />preferred). <br />20. Diversion ditches are proposed to have 2H:1V side slopes. Side slopes this steep are <br />inherently unstable. Please revise the side slopes to no steeper than 2.5H:1V (3H:1V is <br />preferred). <br />SMO Response <br />The ditches have been revised to either have 2.5H:1V side slopes when installed in Pre mine <br />waste rock and Mill tailings. Steeper side slopes (1.5H:1V) are used for the Grouted riprap <br />channels. <br />DRMS Comment <br />21. Half pipe channel segments are proposed for several steep sections. The use of half pipes <br />typically requires significant maintenance. The Division will accept half pipe channels <br />during the operational phase of the mine, provided the Operator will provide a written <br />commitment to perform frequent inspections and perform the necessary maintenance. <br />However, half pipe channels are not acceptable for reclamation channel design. Please <br />submit alternate designs for the post - mining phase. <br />SMO Response <br />The Revenue Mine surface water controls will be inspected and maintained to ensure that they <br />remain sufficient to control runoff according to DRMS and CDPHE rules and regulations. This <br />inspection and maintenance will continue throughout the life of the mining operation and <br />throughout the post mining reclamation phase, until sufficient revegetation of the site has <br />occurred to protect against erosion, and make stormwater controls redundant. Furthermore, <br />reclamation designs for each channel segment that uses a half pipe during mining have been <br />assembled, per the Division's request. These designs can be found on Map G -5 (labeled with <br />(rec)) and in Table 6 -2 in Appendix 6. <br />DRMS Comment <br />22. No hydraulic calculations for any channels were provided. Please provide hydraulic <br />design calculations for all engineered channels. Calculations should include channel <br />evaluations for both stability and capacity, i.e., minimum and maximum expected <br />roughness. For example, an excavated earth channel, after weathering would be expected <br />to have a minimum n = 0.018 (use to evaluate stability or maximum expected velocity); <br />and a maximum n = 0.025 (use to evaluate capacity). In addition, the DRMS requires <br />channel freeboard be evaluated for all engineered channels• channels shall be designed <br />with a minimum of 0.5 feet of freeboard unless the velocity head (v /2g) is significant, <br />then the minimum required freeboard is half the velocity head, or v /4g. NOTE — some <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.