My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-08-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
1982-08-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2020 7:25:39 PM
Creation date
12/10/2012 11:27:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/24/1982
Doc Name
Draft Findings Response
From
CF & I Steel Corporation
To
Mined Land Reclamation
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAXWELL MINE <br /> File No. C-013-81 <br /> Response to Draft Findings Document <br /> VIM . Alluvial Valley Floors (2 .06 .8, .24) <br /> The generalized Land Use Map (Map 4) should not be construed <br /> as depicting the precise location of historically irrigated <br /> lands . The purpose of the map is to illustrate the location <br /> of use practices with respect to each other as shown on the Las <br /> Animas County Land Use Map and as cited in the legend of Map 4 of <br /> the permit application. Plate 6A identifies the specific areas <br /> within the valley floors that have been historically irrigated. <br /> The maps utilized in the proper context eliminates the un- <br /> certainty expressed , and the need for a stipulation in the draft <br /> findings document. <br /> With respect to alluvial valley floor determinations, CF&I <br /> is concerned about the Division' s reluctance to evaluate on a <br /> regional basis rather than on a site-specific basis. CF�CI has <br /> provided a, substantive address to the consequences of its <br /> activities on the alluvial system. That address indicates the <br /> Purgatoire River val-leys to be the only areas where irrigation <br /> has been historically practiced, where perennial streams exist, <br /> where ground water is sufficiently abundant to support hydro- <br /> phytic vegetation and where topography is conducive to irrigation <br /> practices. References cited in Exhibit 6 , USGS publications on <br /> the geology and hydrology of the area, U.S . Soil Conservation <br /> Service publications and known pending studies should provide <br /> sufficient information for the Division to determine that the <br /> north fork, mid-fork and mai.nstem of the Purgatoire River are the <br /> only segments of the system that can reasonably be regarded as <br /> containing, an alluvial valley floor. Should the Division engage <br /> in such determination, the exercise would eliminate the <br /> imposition of a microscopic address to each of the side canyons <br /> tributary to the Purgatoire River. <br /> The accompanying letter from BLM is provided as an aid for <br /> the Division to find the north fork, mid-fork, south fork and <br /> ma.instem of the Purgatoire system to be of concern with respect <br /> to elements of alluvial valley floor determinations. Had the <br /> tracts, subjects of the inventory, progressed to development , the <br /> current Division approach would dictate a rigorous alluvial <br /> valley determination for each of the canyons beyond the <br /> Picketwire Valley after the RLM had previously declared them <br /> suitable to mine. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.