My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-03-03_REPORT - C1981013 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
1986-03-03_REPORT - C1981013 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2020 5:19:48 AM
Creation date
12/7/2012 1:14:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/3/1986
Doc Name
1985 Annual Hydrology Report (Part 1 0f 2)
From
Wyoming Fuel Company
Annual Report Year
1985
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
During each monthly sampling, in-situ water quality measurements of temperature, <br /> conductivity and pH were made using a Hydro Lab Model 4000 field sampling kit. An <br /> expanded list of water quality parameters was collected during the quarterly and annual <br /> samplings which were sent to Core Laboratories, Inc., of Denver for laboratory analysis. <br /> Filtration of certain water quality parameters was accomplished in the field with a <br /> Geotech 2.4 liter barrel filter. <br /> Quality control of water analyses was performed by two methods. Prior to any field <br /> sampling, the Hydro Lab Sampling Kit was calibrated to known standards produced in the <br /> laboratory. A record of each calibration was kept as to the date, person performing the <br /> calibration, and adjustments made. Core Laboratories, Inc. maintains internal quality <br /> control of sample handling and instrumentation calibration. During the November <br /> sampling, one of the samples was split in the field and half was submitted to the lab as a <br /> blank. Analyses were compared and all were found to be within five percent. <br /> Water quantity or flow measurements were conducted by a number of methods. At <br /> the beginning of the program, a straight, flat, stable reach of each stream station was <br /> selected as a sampling location. Near the downstream end of the reach, a cross-section <br /> was surveyed perpendicular to the stream flow and permanently marked with stakes and <br /> flagging. Flow was measured with a Teledyne-Gurley Model 625 Pygmy type current <br /> meter using the USGS six-tenths-depth method. During 1985 at the Purgatoire River <br /> stations, staff gages were established on bridges above, between and below the two mines <br /> providing data to calculate a stage-discharge curve for future discharge measurements. <br /> These curves will be developed following the spring 1986 high flow events. At the mine <br /> discharge stations, discharge was measured by the pump ratings or by a direct volumetric <br /> measurement with a calibrated container. In Apache and Santistevan Canyons, calibrated <br /> flume stations were constructed and Stevens Type F continuous recorders were installed. <br /> During each visit to these two stations, the recorders were visually inspected and <br /> maintained. This included: <br /> 1. Checking to see that the clock mechanism was functioning properly and marking the <br /> recorder charts with data points; <br /> 2. Comparing the staff gage reading and recorder stage height to verify proper <br /> functioning of the stage recorder; <br /> -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.