Laserfiche WebLink
Wet Canyon (WCS-1) to gather baseline data for those drainages. At <br /> each station, a staff and crest gauge were installed to gather base <br /> and peak flow events. These stations are monitored monthly. During <br /> 1989 monitoring of these three stations, stations CHC-1 and LCS-1 were <br /> dry. Also, no crest events were recorded at these two stations. <br /> Station WCS-1 exhibited a base flow condition. No peak flow events <br /> were recorded at WCS-1 during the year. All data collected at these <br /> stations is presented in Tables 1-11, 1-12 and 1-13 of Appendix 1. <br /> Data collected over the two years in which the stations have been <br /> monitored is contained in Table 1-14. <br /> 3 . 2 Ground Water <br /> Seven wells in the Purgatoire River alluvium and one well in <br /> Ciruela Canyon were monitored quarterly during 1989. Generally, wells <br /> within the Purgatoire alluvium responded directly to the level of <br /> water in the river. The well in Ciruela Canyon responded primarily <br /> to precipitation received in the drainage. All data is contained in <br /> Table 2-1 through 2-8 of Appendix 1. Table 2-9 summarizes all data <br /> collected over the previous five years of monitoring. <br /> Wells PAW-1 and PAW-2 were established to monitor the existing <br /> refuse pile at the New Elk Mine. The summary presented in Table 2-9 <br /> indicates some differences in water quality between the two wells. <br /> PAW-2 has a higher ionization of the water and higher concentrations <br /> of TDS, conductivity, iron, manganese, sodium, sulfate, calcium, <br /> magnesium and bicarbonate. PAW-1 is a calcium-bicarbonate water. <br /> Water in PAW-2 is a mixed calcium/sodium-bicarbonate type. Metals <br /> analyzed for PAW-1 were near or below detection limits while iron and <br /> manganese was elevated at station PAW-2 . These elevated levels <br /> indicate that the coal refuse is leaching into the alluvial aquifer. <br /> -17- <br />