2012-11-13_HYDROLOGY - M1977348 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 Golder Associates ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER METHOD QUAL DESCRIPTION L95375 -04 WG325644 Boron, dissolved Copper, dissolved WG325615 Lead, dissolved WG325644 Lithium, dissolved Manganese, dissolved Potassium, dissolved Sodium, dissolved WG325615 Thallium, dissolved Uranium, dissolved WG325644 Zinc, dissolved WG325507 Chloride WG325516 Fluoride WG325392 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved Nitrite as N, dissolved WG325534 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C WG325507 Sulfate L95375 -05 WG325592 Barium, dissolved Sodium, dissolved REPAD.15.06.05.01 WG325507 Chloride WG325516 Fluoride WG325392 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved Nitrite as N, dissolved WG325507 Sulfate M200 7 ICP M200 7 ICP M200.8 ICP -MS M200 7 ICP M200 7 ICP M200 7 ICP M200 7 ICP M200 8 ICP -MS M200 8 ICP -MS M200 7 ICP M300.0 - Ion Chromatography SM4500F -C M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353 2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction SM2540C M300 0 - Ion Chromatography M300 0 - Ion Chromatography M200 7 ICP M200 7 ICP M300 0 - Ion Chromatography SM4500F -C M353 2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353 2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M300.0 - Ion Chromatography D1 01 DD D1 D1 D1 01 DD DD 01 RA RA RA RA ZO D1 RA M3 M3 RA RA RA RA RA Inorganic Extended Qualifier Report ACZ Project ID: L95375 Sample required dilution due to matrix Sample required dilution due to matrix. Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor. Sample required dilution due to matrix Sample required dilution due to matrix. Sample required dilution due to matrix Sample required dilution due to matrix Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor Sample required dilution due to matrix. Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 mg Sample required dilution due to matrix. Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) Page 24 of 37