My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-11-13_HYDROLOGY - M1977348
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977348
>
2012-11-13_HYDROLOGY - M1977348
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:10:29 PM
Creation date
11/13/2012 12:59:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977348
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
11/13/2012
Doc Name
Second Quarter 2012 Groundwater Sampling
From
Golder Associates
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Golder Associates <br />ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />QUAL DESCRIPTION <br />L95375 -01 WG325507 Chloride <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />WG325516 Fluoride <br />WG325392 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG325445 pH <br />WG325460 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C <br />WG325507 Sulfate <br />WG325445 Total Alkalinity <br />L95375 -02 WG325507 Chloride <br />WG325516 Fluoride <br />WG325392 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG325460 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG325507 Sulfate <br />L95375-03 WG325507 Chloride <br />WG325516 Fluoride <br />WG325392 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG325507 Sulfate <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />SM4500H+ B <br />SM2540C <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM2320B - Titration <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />D1 <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />ZW <br />ZO <br />RA <br />ZW <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />ZO <br />D1 <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />RA <br />D1 <br />RA <br />Inorganic Extended <br />Qualifier Report <br />ACZ Project ID: L95375 <br />Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Method deviation. The sample was centrifuged prior to <br />analysis due to high solid content. <br />Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg. <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Method deviation The sample was centrifuged prior to <br />analysis due to high solid content <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg. <br />Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Sample required dilution due to matrix. <br />Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />Page 23 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.