My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-03-22_REPORT - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1985-03-22_REPORT - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2020 8:00:49 AM
Creation date
11/7/2012 6:51:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/22/1985
Doc Name
Supplementary Information to 1984 Annual Report.
From
Climax
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Supplementary Information to <br /> 1984 Annual Report, Climax Mine <br /> March 21, 1985 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Question: Areas 31F and 35A-Revegetation Other Disturbances at <br /> $ 1 , 250: Same discussion as presented under Area 11A <br /> above. <br /> Our brevity has resulted in omission. The average <br /> revegetation cost of $2, 250 per acre presented in the <br /> annual report is more appropriately described as the <br /> Average Difficult Site Revegetation cost. Difficult <br /> sites are sites which require some amendment such as <br /> sewage , wood chips , straw, excelsior mat , jute net- <br /> ting , etc . Examples of difficult sites are steep <br /> slopes, tailing surfaces and tailing dams. <br /> Some areas are not difficult to revegetate . Some <br /> sites are relatively flat, have a good quality growth <br /> medium in place , and are easily revegetated without <br /> amendment. Revegetation of this type of site can be <br /> accomplished for $1 , 250 per acre. In Area 31, the <br /> Mayflower Tailing Pond, we estimate 75 acres of this <br /> type of disturbance exists around the perimeter of <br /> the tailing. Area 35, Mayflower Topsoil Stockpiles , <br /> is another example of this type of revegetation. The <br /> stockpile area , once the stockpile is removed , is <br /> easily revegetated without amendment. <br /> Annual Report <br /> As discussed during our phone conversation of March 14, 1985, <br /> most of the eight information items required by Rule 2. 41 are very <br /> awkward to respond to for an operation such as Climax. Essenti- <br /> ally all of the disturbed areas at Climax that will not be redis- <br /> turbed in the future have been revegetated, and , we have revege- <br /> tated these areas well in advance of the permit timetables. <br /> Increases in disturbed acreages each year are due to the <br /> deposition of tailing , mainly at Mayflower pond , and possible <br /> growth of the Open Pit. As reported in the 1982 Annual Report <br /> ( submitted February 28, 1983) , Mayflower tailing covered 302 acres <br /> and was expected to increase to 318 acres by the end of 1984. <br /> ( Mayflower was bonded for 388 acres . ) The slow rate of increase <br /> for this time period was because of the slowdown in production <br /> rates from September 1982 into April 1984. As of the end of 1984, <br /> Mayflower tailing covered a total of about 315 acres and we <br /> anticipate that it will grow to 375 acres by the end of 1986 (as <br /> indicated in the cost breakdown of Area 31 of the current Annual <br /> Report) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.