My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-23_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982057A
>
2012-01-23_PERMIT FILE - C1982057A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:47 PM
Creation date
10/23/2012 9:49:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/23/2012
Doc Name
Summary Report Identifying unstable areas within the II-W Disturbance Boundary
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 20 Attachment 20-E
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />t,} <br />During he heavy spring runoff f 1 - <br />g vy sp g ff o 201 ,the Seneca II W reclaimed areas experienced numerous <br />new and reactivated landslides, slumps and mudflows. A site visit and meeting was held on July <br />6 and 7, 2011 with Jill Carlson (Colorado Geological Survey), Sandy Brown (DRMS), Susan <br />Burgmaier (DBMS), Brian Len (NWCC) and SCC personnel to discuss and identify areas of <br />instability. SCC has prepared the following documentation to: 1) indentify unstable areas within <br />the disturbance boundary; 2) document present conditions of each area; and 3) present a <br />remediation plan/approach for each area. This proposed plan is based on a report prepared by <br />Jill Carlson (CGS); the report is attached for reference. <br />AREAS TO BE REPAIRED/STABILIZED <br />® Oil Well Access Road Slump <br />— Problem: This was a small slump that encroached upon the road ditch and disrupted <br />surface drainage on upper side of the road. <br />— Remediation: The slump area was regarded; the ditch reopened; a drain was installed to <br />allow unrestricted water flow out of the slump area; and, a rock toe buttress /retaining <br />wall was install to add additional stability. <br />— Status: Work has been completed <br />Pump house Slide <br />Y — Problem: This was a small slide area that had water flowing out of the toe and that <br />encroached into the road ditch. <br />— Remediation: The slide area was regarded; the ditch reopened; a drain was installed to <br />allow unrestricted water flow from the toe of the slide area; a road above the slide area <br />was reclaimed to eliminate channelized flow into the slide area; and, the area was <br />revegetated. <br />— Status: Work has been completed <br />® Pit Ramp Slide <br />— Problem: The slide is situated on or near a final pit highwall and access road ramp. This <br />area has been "remediated" numerous times using recommendations from Division <br />specialists and from accredited geotechnical engineers to no avail. These measures <br />included reducing the slope grade above the slide, regrading the scarp and reducing the <br />loading in the upper portions of the slide block. <br />During the latest inspection, SCC learned that the area was historically mapped as <br />containing a mud flow, landslide deposits and generally unstable slopes (Madole, Colton, <br />and Miller). So it appears that the backfill in this area is resting on unstable native <br />materials causing continuing instability and "sliding ". <br />— Remediation: <br />1. Excavate two trench drains <br />2. As recommended by CGS, one trench is proposed along the existing gullies near the <br />horizontal midpoint of the slide mass, and another in the wet area near the western toe <br />bulge above the road ditch. The trenches should extend through the slide mass and <br />TR -76 20-E -1 I1 /11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.