My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-09-28_REVISION - M1977307 (27)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977307
>
2012-09-28_REVISION - M1977307 (27)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:25:47 PM
Creation date
10/23/2012 8:10:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977307
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/28/2012
Doc Name
EPP Submittal- SPLP Data
From
Cotter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.2 Design Storms <br />DRMS requires analysis using 10 -year and 100 -year, 24 -hour storm events. The National <br />Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 2, Volume III isopluvials were used in <br />conjunction with site locations (latitude and longitude) to determine precipitation amounts for the <br />given storms. Copies of these charts are included in the attachments. <br />7.3 RunoMischarze Calculations <br />Peak flows were determined for the 100 -year storm in all basins to determine required capacities <br />for the diversion channels. SCS Unit Hydrograph Methods were applied utilizing "Haestad Pond <br />Pack" software. Worksheets and results produced by the software are included in the <br />attachments. Primary input requirements are: runoff curve number (CN), precipitation, and time <br />of concentration. NOTE: The two offsite basins are labeled "OFF 10" and "OFF 20 ", and the <br />one onsite basin is labeled "30 ", or "ONSITE 30 ". <br />Curve numbers were taken from tables available from several sources based on surface soil types <br />and vegetation. Surface soils at the site are considered "Hydrologic Soils Group B" (soils having <br />a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of moderately deep to <br />deep, moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse texture) <br />given the soils report provided by NRCS. Surface vegetation is considered " Pinyon/Juniper" <br />with either poor or fair stands or a weighted combination of both. The larger offsite basins have <br />areas with varying concentrations of pinyon/juniper stands and are undisturbed; therefore, they <br />received weighted combinations of CN values (varying from 58 to 75). The onsite basins are <br />mainly disturbed areas void of vegetation and were therefore assigned a CN of 75 for "poor" <br />stands in Type `B" soils. <br />Times of concentration were computed for each basin utilizing widely accepted formulas for <br />computation of sheet -flow, shallow concentrated flow, and channel -flow from the headwaters to <br />the receiving storage area. <br />Results of the 100 -year peak flows are summarized here for each basin: <br />BASIN RUNOFF DESCRIPTION <br />Offsite 10 Q100 = 1.40 cfs Undisturbed pinyon/juniper stands <br />Offsite 20 Q100 = 2.38 cfs Undisturbed pinyon/juniper stands <br />Onsite 30 Q100 = 3.84 cfs Disturbed, mine yard area, and stockpile areas <br />Capacities of the diversion channels were analyzed using Manning's Equation for improved <br />cross - sections at locations shown on the attached sheets. Channel analysis shows that the <br />improved diversion channels will be capable of transporting the 100 -year flows generated by <br />their respective basins around the site generally within the bottom 12" of the channel. Actual <br />ESWMP -5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.