_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (179)

Home Browse Search

RESPONSE: Minerals has not made a decision regarding the documents it expects to introduce into evidence, or which any witness may discuss or refer to at the trial of this matter. II. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS Request No. 1. Admit that Minerals makes or has made financial decisions concerning Resources . OBJECTION: The defendant objects to this request on the grounds that it is overly broad, vague, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Request No. 2 . Admit that Minerals makes or has made decision which affected the mining operation of Resources . OBJECTION: See objection to Request No. 1 . Request No. 3. Admit that Resources was a co-obligor with Resources for the loan from Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company. OBJECTION: Minerals objects to this request on the grounds that it is non-sensical . Request No. 4 . Admit that Minerals was involved in or participated in decisions to modernize Resources mine site . OBJECTION: See objection to Request No. 1 . Request No. 5 . Admit that Minerals wholly owns Resources . OBJECTION AND R£SPOYISE: The defendant objects to this request on the grounds that it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. However, without waiving this objection, the defendant provides the following response: Admit . Request No. 6 . Admit that individuals who are directors or officers of Minerals are also directors or officer of Resources . RESPOASE: Because of the way the request is phrased, the defendant cannot admit or deny. However, without waiving its response, the defendant states that some officers and directors of Minerals are also officers and directors of Resources , and some officers and directors of Resources are officers and directors of Minerals . Request Wo. 7 . Admit the Minerals held meetings in which Resources was discussed. - 25 -