My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (143)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (143)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:37:51 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 8:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-34- <br /> Cessation Order No. C-084-134 <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> I. FINDING OF VIOLATION <br /> During the June, 1984 inspection, Jim Herron, of the Mined Land <br /> Reclamation Division, determined that there was a failure to abate <br /> violation NOV 084-088 within the prescribed abatement period. A <br /> Cessation Order was issued for failure to protect off-site areas from <br /> damage which may result from underground coal mining activities. <br /> The particular area of concern was adjacent to the access road for the <br /> No. 2 mine coal stockpile. The inspector determined that the abatement <br /> effort which was focused upon cleaning up an off-site area where coal <br /> had been pushed, had not been successful . The inspector felt that too <br /> much coal was still remaining in the off-site area. During the <br /> conference it was shown that the operator did put forth a reasonable <br /> effort toward cleaning up the coal alongside the road. The operator <br /> used the same approach that was used in other abatement activities <br /> which were found to be acceptable. Also, it was acknowledged in the <br /> inspection report that a small amount of coal would be left following <br /> cleanup activities. <br /> While the inspector had a legitimate basis for issuing the Cessation <br /> Order, no quantitative information about the insufficiency of the <br /> cleanup was available. Based on the good faith effort toward abatement <br /> made by the operator, the inspector should have agreed to extend the <br /> abatement schedule in order to achieve cleanup results more to his <br /> liking. The desired cleanup occurred within one day after the <br /> Cessation Order was given. A Cessation Order was not justified in this <br /> case. The Cessation Order is vacated by the Director. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.