_INSPECTION - C1981010 ‎(3)‎

• Permit No: C1981010
• IBM Index Class Name: Inspection
• Doc Name: Inspection Report
• From: DRMS
• To: Forrest & Graham
• Inspection Date: 10/4/2012
• Email Name: JLE
• Email Name: SB1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

October 4, 2012 C-1981-010/Trapper Mine JLE
The Ash Pit was observed. The spoil depth test pits observed during the August, 2012 inspection have been filled
in and the area has been graded. Topsoil from the Ash 10 stockpile has been spread over the backfilled area.
HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05, Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5,
4.05.6, Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4, Effluent Limits 4.05.2, Ground Water
Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage—Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8,
Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9, Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18:
West Horse pond was holding a small amount of water but was not discharging. The sediment marker was in
place. Overall the combined-spillway appeared stable,however it appears cattle or wildlife has trampled the
erosion control matting placed in the spillway*. The flume was in place and functional.
Horse Gulch pond was holding water but was not discharging. According to Mr. Luke,this pond was recently*
drained to check the depth of the sediment level. The Division did not observe a sediment marker. This marker
will need to be replaced. The pond embankment appeared stable and vegetated.
West I'veatt 41 pond was recently*cleaned to restore its sediment storage capacity*. This pond was holding water
but was not discharging. The sediment marker was in place and the embankment and spilhvayT were stable and
functional.
East I'veatt pond 43 was holding water and not discharging. The spilhvayT is vegetated and stable. The sediment
marker is in place.
East I'veatt pond 42 was holding water and discharging. The embankment appeared stable and vegetated. The
spilhvaN-was clear and functional. The sediment marker needs to be replaced.
Oak pond 41 was recently*cleaned. The sediment marker was in place. The embankment appeared stable and the
spilhvaN-was clear and functional. This pond was holding water but was not discharging.
Oak pond 42 was holding water but was not discharging. The embankment appeared stable and the spilhvaN-was
clear and functional.
Middle Flume 43 pond was holding water but not discharging. Anew flume has been installed below this pond.
The pond embankment appeared stable and the spillway*was functional. The sediment marker was not observed
and will need to be replaced.
Johnson 41OR was holding water and discharging. The sediment marker was not observed and will need to be
replaced.
Jonson 47 Pond needs to be cleaned.
West Flume Diversion 1 was walked;this ditch is filled with silt in the lower reaches of the drainage. This ditch
will need to be cleaned to restore its capacity*. West Flume Diversion 2 was not walked,but it is likely*it is in a
Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2
Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2
Page 3 of 10