My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1986-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2020 4:45:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 11:22:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/7/1986
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert Hagen - 2 - September 9, 1985 <br /> In regard to violation No. 2 of TDN 85-2-244-9, it was stated in your <br /> correspondence of August 29, 1985 that visual inspection of the surface area <br /> (at the rock tunnel waste ponds) indicates that material greater than six (6) <br /> inches was placed in the embankments. The Division would like to emphasize <br /> that in an embankment of this width (approximately 15 feet wide at the crest <br /> and 50 feet wide at the base) the material present at the surface is not a <br /> good indicator of the material within the embankment. As material is placed <br /> and worked in each two foot thick lift, the large material is winnowed from <br /> the center and collects on the outer edge of the worked lift. Also, as stated <br /> in the initial response to this TDN, testing was conducted as the embankment <br /> was constructed and the dam was certified as being built and compacted <br /> according to design. <br /> An inspector from the Division was present when the embankments in question <br /> were excavated to repair the principal spillway culverts. Photographic slides <br /> taken at this time and observations of the CMLRD inspector show no significant <br /> variations from the size gradation specifications. While excavating, the <br /> operator again conducted nuclear density testing and results were all <br /> acceptable. Due to the predominance of fine matrix material present in the <br /> fill, the nuclear density testing should be valid. <br /> The culverts exhibited piping along their base. The material around the <br /> culvert was replaced with compaction testing conducted throughout the <br /> operation. New, more extensive anti-seep collars were constructed by pouring <br /> concrete cut off walls around the culverts. <br /> The Division finds no evidence of a violation in the testing or material <br /> within the embankment. <br /> The letter accompanying TDN 85-2-244-12 references the original TDN as <br /> 85-2-244-6. Our records show this TDN to be 85-2-244-9. <br /> The Division will be pleased to supply any additional clarifications. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> d a <br /> Supervisor, Coal Program <br /> FRB/ljc <br /> 3232F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.