Laserfiche WebLink
In this appraisal , the market data approach has a limited <br /> application because of lack of highly comparable sales . There is <br /> often a vast difference between properties from the standpoint of <br /> location, type of occupancy, building age and condition. In fact, <br /> there is a substantial difference between the sales . <br /> In making this study, I have considered a number of commercial <br /> property sales in the Glenwood Springs/Garfield County area. A list <br /> of these sales may be found in the Addenda. <br /> The commercial/warehouse sales took place from October 1 , 1976 , <br /> to May, 1979 . The total sales ranged from a low of $59 ,500 to a high <br /> of $256 , 700 . The building sizes ranged from 1 , 700 square feet to <br /> 13 , 661 square feet. Dividing sales prices by gross building area in- <br /> dicates a range from $18. 79 to $50 . 00 per square foot. The gross rent <br /> multiples range from 7. 57 to 9 . 09 . <br /> Other commercial sales known to the writer render gross rent <br /> multiples in a range of 4 . 78 to 11. 0. It is my opinion that the <br /> higher multiples tend to reflect rents that did not represent current <br /> market rents at the time of the sale. The higher multiples also <br /> tended to be associated with sales where amenities other than produc- <br /> tion of income were important. The lower multiples were developed <br /> from sales with higher expense ratios and also were associated with <br /> sales that required more intensive time consuming management as well <br /> as sales with shorter economic lives . <br /> An analysis of market value by the per square foot of building <br /> method was not used in this appraisal as the surplus land and the <br /> various functions which the property serves required so many adjust- <br /> ments as to make this approach an exercise in futility. <br /> None of the listed improved sales are very comparable to the <br /> market data approach. <br /> It is my opinion that the proper gross rent multiple (GRM) in- <br /> dication for the subject property would be 7 . 0. <br /> The following indication seems reasonable and is believed to <br /> incorporate location and project size. <br /> MARKET APPROACH SUMMARY <br /> Gross Rent $221 , 153 X 7 . 00 GRM = $1 ,548 ,071 <br /> Excess Land Contribution - 4 . 5 Acres = $ 400 ,000 <br /> Market Approach Conclusion $1 ,948 ,071 <br /> -12- <br />