My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-11-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 5:40:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 9:00:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/15/1993
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Hydrology Correspondence Part (1 of 2)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> Fz�s:�10 <br /> 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 *, <br /> Denver,CO 80203 <br /> 303 866-3567 ** <br /> FAX. 303 832-8106 �876 _ <br /> January 7 , 1991 Roy Romer, <br /> Governor <br /> Mr. Lew Thom son Fred Banta. <br /> p Division Director <br /> Environmental Supervisor <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> P.O. Box 500 <br /> Carbondale, Colorado 81623 <br /> RE: Coal Basin Mines (C-81-017) , Small-Area Exemption Demonstrations Dated <br /> December 11 , 1990. <br /> Dear Mr. Thompson: <br /> The Division has reviewed these demonstrations and finds that the following <br /> issues must still be addressed: <br /> Mid-Continent must demonstrate either that the 10-year, 24-hour runoff from <br /> each area will be contained by a berm or other treatment facility, or that the <br /> runoff from each area is a non-point source discharge and can therefore be <br /> exempted from sediment control requirements. The first option would require <br /> that runoff calculations ano a structure design be submitted for each area, to <br /> be reviewed by the Division. For the second option, it is recommended that <br /> you contact the Water Quality Control Division concerning whether non-point <br /> source designations are appropriate for these areas. <br /> There are also some inconsistencies in the submittal : <br /> - Exhibit B appears to be an example Findings Document page, which is not <br /> necessary as part of this submittal . <br /> - Area No. 4 in Exhibit A is listed as Area No. 3 in Exhibit B. <br /> - Area No. 3 in Exhibit A is not listed at all in Exhibit B. It is also <br /> not mapped in either this submittal or in the permit application. The <br /> calculations for this area (0,62 acres) can't be verified for these <br /> reasons. <br /> - Statement 2 of the cover letter is not true. <br /> With correction of the above issues, the demonstrations for alternative <br /> sediment control will be approved. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> William B. Crick <br /> Reclamation Specialist <br /> WBC/scg <br /> cc: Mike Savage <br /> 2616F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.