My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-08-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:04:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 8:03:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
8/10/2012
Doc Name
Soils Memo to OSM
From
JoEllen Turner
To
OSM
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIVE: <br />7. The level and slopes of the new field has to be similar since it can impact irrigation and <br />seeding processes (intermountain alfalfa management, UC California, publication 3366). <br />I reviewed soils data gathered by Key Ag Services on the Morgan property in November and <br />December of 2011. My understanding of that data is that it was orderd by DRMS as part of <br />additional permitting review and oversight. Based on a comparison of data obtained by Key <br />Ag Services. The following essential conclusions can be made: <br />1. pH of Bench 1 substitute soil > Lift B> lift A» undisturbed soil; <br />2. EC of Bench 1 substitute soil > Lift B> lift A » undisturbed soil; <br />3. OM% of undisturbed soil >> Bench 1 substitute soil > lift A > lift B; <br />. 4. Rocks >2rum ( %) of Bench 1 substitute soil >> Lift B> lift A» undisturbed soil; and <br />5. Big rocks present in the Bench 1 substitute soil were not accounted for and should be <br />quantified. <br />in summary, the bench 1 substitute soil is significantly more alkaline (high pH) and <br />saline (high EC) than the undisturbed soil. The bench 1 substitute soil contains significantly <br />less organic matter (OM %) than the undisturbed soil. Finally, the rock content and size <br />(>2mm ( %)) is higher in the bench 1 substitute soil than the undisturbed soil. AU of these <br />findings suggest that the bench 1 substitute soil is likely to be less productive than the <br />undisturbed soil. (See Tables below for exact values and comparison). <br />Data from Key Ag Services: <br />suasr iru7esalt <br />.P ECmmhos /an .OM% :8 (m ; >2. m m ; <br />. • TPO6 (a as) 7s s.1: ill 1.91 o.n; <br />;TPO6 (48-140) 7.a _ 4.4 0 0,6 ......_..,,.. 2.36' <br />! 6 12i 1 9 <br />TP07 (60 -126) 7.71 51 0.61 1.6i 1.43 <br />iTP0,3 0 i j <br />- 82 � ,... � ,.._ ,..._ :.... _._ 7.6 1 _. 0.6 . z5 :.__...... _..,...., <br />111 (32- 115} 7.4q 4.3f a6i 1.2t 0.744 <br />yAveregp 7.65 4137 45ti 112 <br />;pH 1 EC mmhos /cm 16M% ;B (mg/kg) 1 >2mm <br />61(0 -48) 7.67. • 3.43 <0.5 0.77 0.29 <br />82 �B3 0- — M simi l arto B1 `slm ilartoel similartoB1 :similar to B1 �similartoB <br />0.42 _ _„ _.... <br />( )_.._,. :similar to 81 Is' B1 si srmiarto B1 ' _ _ _ <br />».,� 84 .. srmrlarto 81 milarto 91 similarto B <br />- 10 (0.40) srmilarto B1 airnil 91 similar to 91 isimilarto 81 • <br />• <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />NO.0743 08/10/2012/FRI 12:11AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.