My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_ENFORCEMENT - C1981017 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_ENFORCEMENT - C1981017 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2020 1:04:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 7:51:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) TDN X-90-02-370-001- TV2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-0• � <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION of <br /> Department of Natural Resources �`� Co,:0 <br /> 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> Denver.CO 80203 <br /> 303 8 6 6-3 5 6 7 * `7 <br /> FAX 303 832-8106 1g6 <br /> Roy Romer, <br /> Governor <br /> DATE: November 5s 1990 Fred Divisi o Banta, <br /> on Director <br /> TO: Jim Stevens <br /> FROM: Larry Routten <br /> RE: NOV's C-90-049, C-90-050, C-90-051 and C-90-052 <br /> In order to assist you in your assessment of the NOV 's issued to Mid-Continent <br /> on October 23, 1990, this memo includes some additional background information <br /> not included in the inspection report. Please let me know if I can answer any <br /> additional questions. <br /> NOV C-90-049 <br /> Neither of the two ponds cited in the violation exhibited signs of imminent or <br /> past failure in handling surface runoff. The toe embankment of the No. 4 Mine <br /> pond was probably not up to specs (steep outslope ) but, it was relatively <br /> stable. The 3 Mine pond appeared stable and functional . <br /> The problem with these ponds in my estimation , is restricted to the fact that <br /> they were not built as designed. I saw no apparent s tab i 1 i ty or functional <br /> problems. <br /> NOV C-90-050 <br /> The road drainage problems cited on Road C (to the No . 4 Mine) appeared to be <br /> the result of several years of degradation. I do not believe there were any <br /> recent drastic changes in the condition of the ditches or culvert outlets <br /> cited. There has been some very significant erosion in the ditches, <br /> especially at RD-5. <br /> The culvert outlets cited do not appear to be in danger of any immediate <br /> drastic degradation. They have undergone considerable downcutting in the past. <br /> Culvert C-3 (the 8 ' diameter pipe ) is in need of replacement. It is still <br /> capable of functioning to a large extent in its current condition. If a <br /> significant flow were to pass through the culvert, the vast majority would <br /> still flow through the culvert (unless it came apart at one of the <br /> deteriorating seams). The integrity of the structure is in jeopardy, as <br /> evidenced by the deteriorating inlet and outlet ends of the CMP and the piping <br /> at the outlet ena, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.