My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-11-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1986-11-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2020 9:13:54 AM
Creation date
10/3/2012 10:18:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/28/1986
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Candace Thompson <br /> August 4 , 1986 <br /> Page two <br /> The purpose of the mine bench stipulation, for example, was "to <br /> determine specific backfilling, grading, drainage, and reclamation <br /> procedures to assure optimum stability of the final reclaimed <br /> portal benches" (See page 52 of the September 1984 Findings <br /> Document) . The stipulation was not to determine how much backfilling <br /> could be accomplished and still attain optimum stability which <br /> seems to be Jeff Deckler' s interpretation of the stipulations. Mid- <br /> Continent' s approved reclamation plan for the benches described <br /> on pages 19-21 of Chapter V should be the plan against which <br /> bonding is required rather than some hypothetical plan of an <br /> average of seven feet of unavailable materials that Jim Herron <br /> proposed. In my June 30, 1986 letter on Estimated Reclamation <br /> Costs I covered, in some detail, Mid-Continent' s position on AOC <br /> and the desirability and rationale for maintaining the relative <br /> level areas where Mid-Continent facilities now exist. Mid- <br /> Continent is convinced that any reclamation plan that includes <br /> backfilling areas with large tonnages of materials (if they can <br /> be found) is inappropriate, unnecessary and wrong for Coal Basin. <br /> The company will defend its position on this subject through <br /> whatever avenues are available. <br /> The width requirement for the haul roads after the rock <br /> tunnel is fully operational is 30 to 40 feet during the remainder <br /> of the mining operation as stated on pages 8 and 22 of the <br /> reclamation plan (Chapter V in Volume 7) and on Page 56 of the <br /> August 1984 MLRD Findings Document. This width is required for <br /> the type of maintenance and emergency equipment that need to <br /> reach the mine portal areas. Also, narrower roads would be <br /> difficult to maintain and accomplish snow removal with the large <br /> equipment required for those accomplishments in the rugged Coal <br /> Basin terrain. Upon cessation of mining the White River National <br /> Forest desires a minimum of 12 foot wide road bed plus a 6 foot <br /> drainage ditch configuration for a total of 18 feet. They also <br /> desire that 22 foot wide passing areas (plus 6 foot drainage <br /> ditch) be retained every quarter of a mile. These figures were <br /> obtained from Mr. Bob Berg, White River National Forest road <br /> engineer. Thus, we have two widths to consider in reclaiming the <br /> haul roads; 30 to 40 feet during mining operations and 18 to 28 <br /> feet after mining ceases. Mid-Continent believes that the concept <br /> outlined in the reclamation plan of moving the drainage ditch in <br /> from the cut banks and letting the inside area fill with natural <br /> sluffing is a sound and reasonable way to reduce the road width. <br /> After one year the sluffed material, plus other that is available <br /> on the uphill portion of the road cut, should be smoothed out <br /> evenly against the highwalls using a special angled blade on a <br /> large grader. The uphill slope can then be revegetated. Mid- <br /> Continent is strongly opposed to the concept of pulling up the <br /> stabilized fill slope materials to backfill the cut slopes for <br /> the reasons covered in my June 30 letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.